1332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26862061)
1. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cochrane systematic reviews in acupuncture: methodological diversity in database searching.
Sood A; Sood R; Bauer BA; Ebbert JO
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Aug; 11(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 16131298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM
Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.
Golder S; McIntosh HM; Loke Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16681854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system.
Royle P; Waugh N
Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(34):iii, ix-x, 1-51. PubMed ID: 14609481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Database coverage and their use in systematic reviews regarding spinal manipulative therapy: an exploratory study.
Eybye MN; Madsen SD; Schultz ANØ; Nim CG
Chiropr Man Therap; 2022 Dec; 30(1):57. PubMed ID: 36536437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.
Topfer LA; Parada A; Menon D; Noorani H; Perras C; Serra-Prat M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 10507189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.
Hanneke R; Young SK
Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):156. PubMed ID: 28789703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase.
Li L; Smith HE; Atun R; Tudor Car L
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):MR000041. PubMed ID: 30860595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study filters for non-randomized studies of interventions consistently lacked sensitivity upon external validation.
Hausner E; Metzendorf MI; Richter B; Lotz F; Waffenschmidt S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):171. PubMed ID: 30563471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Search strategies (filters) to identify systematic reviews in MEDLINE and Embase.
Escobar Liquitay CM; Garegnani L; Garrote V; Solà I; Franco JV
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 9(9):MR000054. PubMed ID: 37681507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree?
Wilkins T; Gillies RA; Davies K
Can Fam Physician; 2005 Jun; 51(6):848-9. PubMed ID: 16926954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study.
Goossen K; Hess S; Lunny C; Pieper D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):138. PubMed ID: 32487023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy.
Shojania KG; Bero LA
Eff Clin Pract; 2001; 4(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 11525102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?
Lui S; Smith EJ; Terplan M
Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-performance information search filters for CKD content in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE.
Iansavichus AV; Hildebrand AM; Haynes RB; Wilczynski NL; Levin A; Hemmelgarn BR; Tu K; Nesrallah GE; Nash DM; Garg AX
Am J Kidney Dis; 2015 Jan; 65(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 25059221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?
Aagaard T; Lund H; Juhl C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27875992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
