These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26862388)

  • 1. Sex dependency of inhibitory control functions.
    Mansouri FA; Fehring DJ; Gaillard A; Jaberzadeh S; Parkington H
    Biol Sex Differ; 2016; 7():11. PubMed ID: 26862388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex differences in inhibitory control in socially-housed baboons (Papio papio).
    Lacreuse A; Gullstrand J; Fagot J
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 312():231-7. PubMed ID: 27321783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex modulates error-induced behavioral adjustments.
    Mansouri FA; Fehring DJ; Feizpour A; Gaillard A; Rosa MG; Rajan R; Jaberzadeh S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 44(2):1856-69. PubMed ID: 27207192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinct neural processes support post-success and post-error slowing in the stop signal task.
    Zhang Y; Ide JS; Zhang S; Hu S; Valchev NS; Tang X; Li CR
    Neuroscience; 2017 Aug; 357():273-284. PubMed ID: 28627420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive mechanisms of inhibitory control deficits in autism spectrum disorder.
    Schmitt LM; White SP; Cook EH; Sweeney JA; Mosconi MW
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2018 May; 59(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 29052841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Right Superior Frontal Gyrus and Individual Variation in Proactive Control of Impulsive Response.
    Hu S; Ide JS; Zhang S; Li CR
    J Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 36(50):12688-12696. PubMed ID: 27974616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contextual response time adaptation in the countermanding performance of rats.
    Beuk J; Beninger RJ; Mechefske E; Paré M
    Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 337():200-217. PubMed ID: 27646289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response Time Adjustment in the Stop Signal Task: Development in Children and Adolescents.
    Dupuis A; Indralingam M; Chevrier A; Crosbie J; Arnold P; Burton CL; Schachar R
    Child Dev; 2019 Mar; 90(2):e263-e272. PubMed ID: 29603204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neuronal Activity in the Premotor Cortex of Monkeys Reflects Both Cue Salience and Motivation for Action Generation and Inhibition.
    Giamundo M; Giarrocco F; Brunamonti E; Fabbrini F; Pani P; Ferraina S
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(36):7591-7606. PubMed ID: 34330772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies": Correction to Best et al. (2016).
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):428. PubMed ID: 28134551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 27832599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Greater activation of the response inhibition network in females compared to males during stop signal task performance.
    Gaillard A; Rossell SL; Carruthers SP; Sumner PJ; Michie PT; Woods W; Neill E; Phillipou A; Toh WL; Hughes ME
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 May; 386():112586. PubMed ID: 32194187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interaction of task-related learning and transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in modulating executive functions.
    Fehring DJ; Illipparampil R; Acevedo N; Jaberzadeh S; Fitzgerald PB; Mansouri FA
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():148-159. PubMed ID: 31100345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of emotional stimuli and oxytocin on inhibition ability and response execution in macaque monkeys.
    Mowlavi Vardanjani M; Ghasemian S; Sheibani V; A Mansouri F
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Sep; 413():113409. PubMed ID: 34111470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Women are more sensitive than men to prior trial events on the Stop-signal task.
    Thakkar KN; Congdon E; Poldrack RA; Sabb FW; London ED; Cannon TD; Bilder RM
    Br J Psychol; 2014 May; 105(2):254-72. PubMed ID: 24754812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Irrelevant angry faces impair response inhibition, and the go and stop processes share attentional resources.
    Pandey S; Gupta R
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):16962. PubMed ID: 36216957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Balancing cognitive demands: control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Bissett PG; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):392-404. PubMed ID: 21171806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of variability of sequence length of go trials preceding a stop trial on ability of response inhibition in stop-signal task.
    Hiraoka K; Kinoshita A; Kunimura H; Matsuoka M
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2018 Jun; 35(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 29848189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methamphetamine-, d-Amphetamine-, and p-Chloroamphetamine-Induced Neurotoxicity Differentially Effect Impulsive Responding on the Stop-Signal Task in Rats.
    Furlong TM; Leavitt LS; Keefe KA; Son JH
    Neurotox Res; 2016 May; 29(4):569-82. PubMed ID: 26846719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.