168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26862724)
1. Nonreassuring Fetal Status in the Second Stage of Labor: Fetal Monitoring Features and Association with Neonatal Outcomes.
Triebwasser JE; Colvin R; Macones GA; Cahill AG
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jun; 33(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 26862724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring features associated with a clinical diagnosis of nonreassuring fetal status.
Rimsza RR; Frolova AI; Kelly JC; Carter EB; Cahill AG; Raghuraman N
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Sep; 5(9):101068. PubMed ID: 37380056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
Timonen S; Holmberg K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonreassuring fetal status during trial of labor after cesarean.
McPherson JA; Strauss RA; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 211(4):408.e1-8. PubMed ID: 24907702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia.
Cahill AG; Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; López JD; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):523.e1-523.e12. PubMed ID: 29408586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonreassuring fetal heart rate decreases heart rate variability in newborn infants.
Sheen TC; Lu MH; Lee MY; Chen SR
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2014 May; 19(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 24766264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms and ST signals is associated with significant reductions in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and cesarean delivery: an observational study in 38,466 deliveries.
Lopes-Pereira J; Costa A; Ayres-De-Campos D; Costa-Santos C; Amaral J; Bernardes J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):269.e1-269.e8. PubMed ID: 30594567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of atypical decelerations with acidemia.
Cahill AG; Roehl KA; Odibo AO; Macones GA
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Dec; 120(6):1387-93. PubMed ID: 23168764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deceleration area and fetal acidemia.
Martí Gamboa S; Lapresta Moros M; Pascual Mancho J; Lapresta Moros C; Castán Mateo S
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Nov; 30(21):2578-2584. PubMed ID: 27819172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The iPREFACE score is useful for predicting fetal acidemia: A retrospective cohort study of 113 patients who underwent emergency cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status during labor.
Ito A; Hayata E; Kotaki H; Shimabukuro M; Takano M; Nagasaki S; Nakata M
AJOG Glob Rep; 2024 May; 4(2):100343. PubMed ID: 38699222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal Sex Differences in Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring.
Porter AC; Triebwasser JE; Tuuli M; Caughey AB; Macones GA; Cahill AG
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(8):786-90. PubMed ID: 26906183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostaglandins and cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in patients delivering small-for-gestational age neonates at term.
Rosenbloom JI; Rhoades JS; Woolfolk CL; Stout MJ; Tuuli MG; Macones GA; Cahill AG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Feb; 34(3):366-372. PubMed ID: 30983445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of Posterior Risk Related to Intrapartum FIGO 2015 Criteria for Cardiotocography in the Second Stage of Labor.
Cavoretto PI; Seidenari A; Amodeo S; Della Gatta AN; Nale R; Ismail YS; Candiani M; Farina A
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2021; 48(2):149-157. PubMed ID: 33508830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia.
Clark SL; Hamilton EF; Garite TJ; Timmins A; Warrick PA; Smith S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 216(2):163.e1-163.e6. PubMed ID: 27751795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atypical decelerations: do they matter?
Martí Gamboa S; Pascual Mancho J; Lapresta Moros M; Rodríguez Lázaro L; de Bonrostro Torralba C; Castán Mateo S
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jan; 30(2):240-244. PubMed ID: 27003711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The correlation between fetal bradycardia area in the second stage of labor and acidemia at birth.
Tranquilli AL; Biagini A; Greco P; Di Tommaso M; Giannubilo SR
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Sep; 26(14):1425-9. PubMed ID: 23488805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The association of fetal acidemia with adverse neonatal outcomes at time of scheduled cesarean delivery.
Bligard KH; Cameo T; McCallum KN; Rubin A; Rimsza RR; Cahill AG; Palanisamy A; Odibo AO; Raghuraman N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):265.e1-265.e8. PubMed ID: 35489441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Terminal fetal heart decelerations and neonatal outcomes.
Cahill AG; Caughey AB; Roehl KA; Odibo AO; Macones GA
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 122(5):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 24104779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative cardiotocography to improve fetal assessment during labor: a preliminary randomized controlled trial.
Ignatov PN; Lutomski JE
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():91-7. PubMed ID: 27567534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal heart rate monitoring category 3 during the 2nd stage of labor is an independent predictor of fetal acidosis.
Silberstein T; Sheiner E; Salem SY; Hamou B; Aricha B; Baumfeld Y; Yohay Z; Elharar D; Idan I; Yohay D
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Feb; 30(3):257-260. PubMed ID: 27023800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
