These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26865158)

  • 1. Research ethics committees in the regulation of clinical research: comparison of Finland to England, Canada, and the United States.
    Hemminki E
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Jan; 14():5. PubMed ID: 26865158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical regulation of biomedical research in Brazil: a quality improvement initiative.
    de Castro DRP; Castillo CHM; Ferreira JPD; Oliveira JPA; Kirsten TF; de França PHC; Zavalhia LS; Notti RK; Kochhann R; Amantéa SL
    BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Jun; 25(1):68. PubMed ID: 38858731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ranking Research Methodology by Risk - a cross-sectional study to determine the opinion of research ethics committee members.
    Kolstoe SE; Durning J; Yost J; Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S
    Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 12(1):154. PubMed ID: 37658420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health Research Ethics Committees in South Africa 12 years into democracy.
    Moodley K; Myer L
    BMC Med Ethics; 2007 Jan; 8():1. PubMed ID: 17254335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees.
    Schuppli CA; Fraser D
    J Med Ethics; 2007 May; 33(5):294-301. PubMed ID: 17470508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Twenty years of human research ethics committees in the Baltic States.
    Dranseika V; Gefenas E; Cekanauskaite A; Hug K; Mezinska S; Peicius E; Silis V; Soosaar A; Strosberg M
    Dev World Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 21134108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consent for Biobanking: The Legal Frameworks of Countries in the BioSHaRE-EU Project.
    Kaye J; Briceño Moraia L; Curren L; Bell J; Mitchell C; Soini S; Hoppe N; Øien M; Rial-Sebbag E
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2016 Jun; 14(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 27145287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research Ethics Committees (RECs) and epidemic response in low and middle income countries.
    Bain LE; Ngwain CG; Nwobegahay J; Sumboh JG; Nditanchou R; Awah PK
    Pan Afr Med J; 2018; 31():209. PubMed ID: 31447968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the Emanuel et al. framework to assess ethical issues raised by a biomedical research ethics committee in South Africa.
    Tsoka-Gwegweni JM; Wassenaar DR
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):36-45. PubMed ID: 25747689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project.
    Dixon-Woods M; Foy C; Hayden C; Al-Shahi Salman R; Tebbutt S; Schroter S
    BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011973. PubMed ID: 27580832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethics and observational studies in medical research: various rules in a common framework.
    Claudot F; Alla F; Fresson J; Calvez T; Coudane H; Bonaïti-Pellié C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 38(4):1104-8. PubMed ID: 19336436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodological challenges in European ethics approvals for a genetic epidemiology study in critically ill patients: the GenOSept experience.
    Tridente A; Holloway PAH; Hutton P; Gordon AC; Mills GH; Clarke GM; Chiche JD; Stuber F; Garrard C; Hinds C; Bion J;
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 May; 20(1):30. PubMed ID: 31064358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical research in Finland in 2002 and 2007: quantity and type.
    Hemminki E; Virtanen J; Veerus P; Regushevskaya E
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2013 May; 11():17. PubMed ID: 23680289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data Access Committees.
    Cheah PY; Piasecki J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):12. PubMed ID: 32013947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Structure and functioning of research ethics committees in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires and Greater Buenos Aires].
    Sabio MF; Bortz JE
    Salud Colect; 2015 Jun; 11(2):247-60. PubMed ID: 26172100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethics committees and the legality of research.
    Douglas TM
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Dec; 33(12):732-6. PubMed ID: 18055906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The risk-benefit task of research ethics committees: an evaluation of current approaches and the need to incorporate decision studies methods.
    Bernabe RD; van Thiel GJ; Raaijmakers JA; van Delden JJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2012 Apr; 13():6. PubMed ID: 22520714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research governance: panacea or problem?
    Samanta A; Samanta J
    Clin Med (Lond); 2005; 5(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 16011214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An ethics framework for consolidating and prioritizing COVID-19 clinical trials.
    Meyer MN; Gelinas L; Bierer BE; Hull SC; Joffe S; Magnus D; Mohapatra S; Sharp RR; Spector-Bagdady K; Sugarman J; Wilfond BS; Lynch HF
    Clin Trials; 2021 Apr; 18(2):226-233. PubMed ID: 33530721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Process of risk assessment by research ethics committees: foundations, shortcomings and open questions.
    Rudra P; Lenk C
    J Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 31924692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.