These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26866317)
21. A stepwise approach to revision total knee arthroplasty. Dennis DA J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4 Suppl 1):32-8. PubMed ID: 17570275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: indications, techniques, and results. Berger RA; Della Valle CJ Instr Course Lect; 2010; 59():47-56. PubMed ID: 20415366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is there a difference in total knee arthroplasty risk of revision in highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene? Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Kurtz S; Love R; Cafri G; Namba RS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar; 473(3):999-1008. PubMed ID: 25567357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Haptic robotics enable a systems approach to design of a minimally invasive modular knee arthroplasty. Banks SA Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Feb; 38(2 Suppl):23-7. PubMed ID: 19340380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cemented and cementless fixation: results and techniques. Silverton CD Instr Course Lect; 2006; 55():429-37. PubMed ID: 16958478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical outcomes in high flexion total knee arthroplasty were not superior to standard posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Guild GN; Labib SA J Arthroplasty; 2014 Mar; 29(3):530-4. PubMed ID: 24268976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Meeting increased demand for total knee replacement and follow-up: determining optimal follow-up. Meding JB; Ritter MA; Davis KE; Farris A Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1484-9. PubMed ID: 24151267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Daines BK; Dennis DA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):1131-9. PubMed ID: 22717832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Increased risk of revision for high flexion total knee replacement with thicker tibial liners. Namba RS; Inacio MC; Cafri G Bone Joint J; 2014 Feb; 96-B(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 24493187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Removal of Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique. Matar HE; Bloch BV; James PJ J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2022; 32(4):57-61. PubMed ID: 36017928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Posterior stabilized versus cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty designs: conformity affects the performance reliability of the design over the patient population. Ardestani MM; Moazen M; Maniei E; Jin Z Med Eng Phys; 2015 Apr; 37(4):350-60. PubMed ID: 25703743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Re: Comparison of the early results of minimally invasive vs standard approaches to total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Liao YY; Lin YM J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):668; author reply 669-70. PubMed ID: 20171041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Salvage revision total knee replacement using the Endo-Model rotating hinge prosthesis. Pradhan NR; Bale L; Kay P; Porter ML Knee; 2004 Dec; 11(6):469-73. PubMed ID: 15581766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Megaprosthesis of the knee in tumor and revision surgery. Pala E; Trovarelli G; Angelini A; Maraldi M; Berizzi A; Ruggieri P Acta Biomed; 2017 Jun; 88(2S):129-138. PubMed ID: 28657574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Early failure of cementless porous tantalum monoblock tibial components. Meneghini RM; de Beaubien BC J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1505-8. PubMed ID: 23561931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]