747 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26866474)
1. Recent Land Use Change to Agriculture in the U.S. Lake States: Impacts on Cellulosic Biomass Potential and Natural Lands.
Mladenoff DJ; Sahajpal R; Johnson CP; Rothstein DE
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148566. PubMed ID: 26866474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest.
Gelfand I; Sahajpal R; Zhang X; Izaurralde RC; Gross KL; Robertson GP
Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7433):514-7. PubMed ID: 23334409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Landscape patterns of bioenergy in a changing climate: implications for crop allocation and land-use competition.
Graves RA; Pearson SM; Turner MG
Ecol Appl; 2016 Mar; 26(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 27209792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carbon debt of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grasslands converted to bioenergy production.
Gelfand I; Zenone T; Jasrotia P; Chen J; Hamilton SK; Robertson GP
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Aug; 108(33):13864-9. PubMed ID: 21825117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biofuels, land, and water: a systems approach to sustainability.
Gopalakrishnan G; Negri MC; Wang M; Wu M; Snyder SW; Lafreniere L
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Aug; 43(15):6094-100. PubMed ID: 19731724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biofuels and biodiversity.
Wiens J; Fargione J; Hill J
Ecol Appl; 2011 Jun; 21(4):1085-95. PubMed ID: 21774415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biofuels on the landscape: is "land sharing" preferable to "land sparing"?
Anderson-Teixeira KJ; Duval BD; Long SP; DeLucia EH
Ecol Appl; 2012 Dec; 22(8):2035-48. PubMed ID: 23387108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of bioenergy on biodiversity arising from land-use change and crop type.
Núñez-Regueiro MM; Siddiqui SF; Fletcher RJ
Conserv Biol; 2021 Feb; 35(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 31854480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems.
Adler PR; Del Grosso SJ; Parton WJ
Ecol Appl; 2007 Apr; 17(3):675-91. PubMed ID: 17494388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the Returns to Land and Greenhouse Gas Savings from Producing Energy Crops on Conservation Reserve Program Land.
Chen L; Blanc-Betes E; Hudiburg TW; Hellerstein D; Wallander S; DeLucia EH; Khanna M
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 55(2):1301-1309. PubMed ID: 33410666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt.
Fargione J; Hill J; Tilman D; Polasky S; Hawthorne P
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5867):1235-8. PubMed ID: 18258862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alternative scenarios of bioenergy crop production in an agricultural landscape and implications for bird communities.
Blank PJ; Williams CL; Sample DW; Meehan TD; Turner MG
Ecol Appl; 2016 Jan; 26(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 27039508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interactions among bioenergy feedstock choices, landscape dynamics, and land use.
Dale VH; Kline KL; Wright LL; Perlack RD; Downing M; Graham RL
Ecol Appl; 2011 Jun; 21(4):1039-54. PubMed ID: 21774412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA.
Graves RA; Haugo RD; Holz A; Nielsen-Pincus M; Jones A; Kellogg B; Macdonald C; Popper K; Schindel M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230424. PubMed ID: 32275725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The biogeochemistry of bioenergy landscapes: carbon, nitrogen, and water considerations.
Robertson GP; Hamilton SK; Del Grosso SJ; Parton WJ
Ecol Appl; 2011 Jun; 21(4):1055-67. PubMed ID: 21774413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The potential impacts of biomass feedstock production on water resource availability.
Stone KC; Hunt PG; Cantrell KB; Ro KS
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Mar; 101(6):2014-25. PubMed ID: 19939667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the Potential of Marginal Land for Cellulosic Feedstock Production and Carbon Sequestration in the United States.
Emery I; Mueller S; Qin Z; Dunn JB
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 51(1):733-741. PubMed ID: 27976872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands.
Campbell JE; Lobell DB; Genova RC; Field CB
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Aug; 42(15):5791-4. PubMed ID: 18754510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integral analysis of environmental and economic performance of combined agricultural intensification & bioenergy production in the Orinoquia region.
Ramirez-Contreras NE; Fontanilla-Díaz CA; Pardo LE; Delgado T; Munar-Florez D; Wicke B; Ruíz-Delgado J; van der Hilst F; Garcia-Nuñez JA; Mosquera-Montoya M; Faaij APC
J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 303():114137. PubMed ID: 34847366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Greenhouse gas mitigation on marginal land: a quantitative review of the relative benefits of forest recovery versus biofuel production.
Evans SG; Ramage BS; DiRocco TL; Potts MD
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(4):2503-11. PubMed ID: 25582654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
