These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26866811)

  • 1. Effects of Physiological Internal Noise on Model Predictions of Concurrent Vowel Identification for Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    Hedrick MS; Moon IJ; Woo J; Won JH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149128. PubMed ID: 26866811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of fundamental frequency differences in the perceptual separation of competing vowel sounds by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss.
    Arehart KH; King CA; McLean-Mudgett KS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 9430762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation, and relative amplitude.
    Arehart KH; Rossi-Katz J; Swensson-Prutsman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):236-52. PubMed ID: 15938067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of hearing loss on identification of asynchronous double vowels.
    Lentz JJ; Marsh SL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1354-67. PubMed ID: 17197501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of reduced audible bandwidth on asynchronous double-vowel identification.
    Valentine S; Lentz JJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1750-64. PubMed ID: 22615479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Categorical dependence of vowel detection in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4539-46. PubMed ID: 18537402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences.
    Choi JM; Purcell DW; Coyne JA; Aiken SJ
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):637-50. PubMed ID: 23575462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual and Model-Based Evaluation of Ideal Time-Frequency Noise Reduction in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Koning R; Bruce IC; Denys S; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Mar; 26(3):687-697. PubMed ID: 29522412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of age on concurrent vowel perception in acoustic and simulated electroacoustic hearing.
    Arehart KH; Souza PE; Muralimanohar RK; Miller CW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 54(1):190-210. PubMed ID: 20689036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of vowel identity and onset asynchrony on concurrent vowel identification.
    Hedrick MS; Madix SG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):696-705. PubMed ID: 18952855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational model predictions of cues for concurrent vowel identification.
    Chintanpalli A; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Oct; 15(5):823-37. PubMed ID: 25002128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved Detection of Vowel Envelope Frequency Following Responses Using Hotelling's T2 Analysis.
    Vanheusden FJ; Bell SL; Chesnaye MA; Simpson DM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 29757799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of vowel auditory training on concurrent speech segregation in hearing impaired children.
    Talebi H; Moossavi A; Lotfi Y; Faghihzadeh S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2015 Jan; 124(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 24973337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing two things at once: neurophysiological indices of speech segregation and identification.
    Alain C; Reinke K; He Y; Wang C; Lobaugh N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):811-8. PubMed ID: 15904547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vowel identification by listeners with hearing impairment in response to variation in formant frequencies.
    Molis MR; Leek MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Aug; 54(4):1211-23. PubMed ID: 21297168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.