478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26867093)
1. Stress Distribution on Short Implants at Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Bone Model With Different Bone-to-Implant Contact Ratio: Finite Element Analysis.
Yazicioglu D; Bayram B; Oguz Y; Cinar D; Uckan S
J Oral Implantol; 2016 Feb; 42(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 26867093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of stress induced by different lengths of osseointegrated implants in the anterior maxilla.
Lee JS; Lim YJ
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16(11):1143-9. PubMed ID: 22397684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
Li X; Staden RV; Hong G
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Cinar D; Imirzalioglu P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27004295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the influence of crestal cortical bone and sinus floor cortical bone in posterior maxilla bi-cortical dental implantation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yan X; Zhang X; Chi W; Ai H; Wu L
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 25330164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A finite element study of short dental implants in the posterior maxilla.
van Staden RC; Li X; Guan H; Johnson NW; Reher P; Loo YC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):e147-54. PubMed ID: 24683579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Osseointegrated Implants Placed in Bone of Different Densities With Cemented Fixed Prosthetic Restoration.
Chidambaravalli K; Krishnan V
J Oral Implantol; 2020 Oct; 46(5):480-490. PubMed ID: 32315437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Influence of thread shapes of custommade root-analogue implants on stress distribution of peri-implant bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis].
Lin CP; Lu SH; Zhu JX; Hu HC; Yue ZG; Tang ZH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Dec; 51(6):1130-1137. PubMed ID: 31848517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of maxillary cortical bone thickness, implant design and implant diameter on stress around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Okumura N; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Kurokawa K; Nomura S
J Prosthodont Res; 2010 Jul; 54(3):133-42. PubMed ID: 20153281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Implant Diameter and Bruxism on Biomechanical Performance in Maxillary All-on-4 Treatment: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Sezer T; Kilic K; Esim E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):709-721. PubMed ID: 35904827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Different Surgical Techniques in the All-on-4 Treatment Concept: Evaluation of the Stress Distribution Created in Implant and Peripheral Bone with Finite Element Analysis.
Ciftci S; Ungor C; Suleymanli B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Dec; 38(6):1135-1144. PubMed ID: 38085744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical finite element analysis of a single implant threaded in anterior and posterior regions of maxilla bone.
Sabri LA; Hussein FA; Al-Zahawi AR; Abdulrahman BY; Salloomi KN
Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(2):203-208. PubMed ID: 32436898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of short dental implants in the posterior maxilla.
Kim S; Kim S; Choi H; Woo D; Park YB; Shim JS; Kim HS; Lee KW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):e155-64. PubMed ID: 24683580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
