These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26867161)
21. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies. Van Roosbroeck S; Hoeck S; Van Hal G Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 22560885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Offering people a choice for colorectal cancer screening. Senore C; Ederle A; Benazzato L; Arrigoni A; Silvani M; Fantin A; Fracchia M; Armaroli P; Segnan N Gut; 2013 May; 62(5):735-40. PubMed ID: 22442162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Low subjective health literacy is associated with adverse health behaviors and worse health-related quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors: results from the profiles registry. Husson O; Mols F; Fransen MP; van de Poll-Franse LV; Ezendam NP Psychooncology; 2015 Apr; 24(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 25241852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The psychological impact of being offered surveillance colonoscopy following attendance at colorectal screening using flexible sigmoidoscopy. Miles A; Atkin WS; Kralj-Hans I; Wardle J J Med Screen; 2009; 16(3):124-30. PubMed ID: 19805753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Screening for colorectal cancer in Italy, 2009 survey. Zorzi M; Baracco S; Fedato C; Grazzini G; Sassoli De' Bianchi P; Senore C; Visioli CB; Cogo C Epidemiol Prev; 2011; 35(5-6 Suppl 5):55-77. PubMed ID: 22166350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The psychological impact of participating in colorectal cancer screening by faecal immuno-chemical testing--the Australian experience. Bobridge A; Bampton P; Cole S; Lewis H; Young G Br J Cancer; 2014 Aug; 111(5):970-5. PubMed ID: 24983363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient-reported outcomes following flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in a demonstration screening programme in the UK. Robb KA; Lo SH; Power E; Kralj-Hans I; Edwards R; Vance M; von Wagner C; Atkin W; Wardle J J Med Screen; 2012 Dec; 19(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 23486697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Socioeconomic status differences in coping with a stressful medical procedure. Simon AE; Steptoe A; Wardle J Psychosom Med; 2005; 67(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 15784793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An online self-test added to colorectal cancer screening can increase the effectiveness of familial cancer risk assessment without increasing distress. van Erkelens A; Sie AS; Spanier MBW; van Kouwen M; Visser A; Prins JB; Hoogerbrugge N Colorectal Dis; 2018 Oct; 20(10):897-904. PubMed ID: 29956442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An analysis of the duplicate testing strategy of an Irish immunochemical faecal occult blood test colorectal cancer screening programme. Kelley L; Swan N; Hughes DJ Colorectal Dis; 2013 Sep; 15(9):e512-21. PubMed ID: 23746062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Hardcastle JD; Chamberlain JO; Robinson MH; Moss SM; Amar SS; Balfour TW; James PD; Mangham CM Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9040):1472-7. PubMed ID: 8942775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Colorectal cancer screening with the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing: a French population-based controlled study (Wintzenheim trial). Denis B; Gendre I; Aman F; Ribstein F; Maurin P; Perrin P Eur J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 45(18):3282-90. PubMed ID: 19665368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening for colorectal cancer in Italy: 2006 survey. Zorzi M; Falcini F; Fedato C; Grazzini G; de' Bianchi PS; Senore C; Vettorazzi M; Visioli C; Zappa M Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(2 Suppl 1):55-68. PubMed ID: 18770995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reappraisal of the options for colorectal cancer screening in England. Whyte S; Chilcott J; Halloran S Colorectal Dis; 2012 Sep; 14(9):e547-61. PubMed ID: 22390210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer. Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Screening for colorectal cancer: sense and sensibilities. Van Hal G; Hoeck S; Van Roosbroeck S Eur J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 47 Suppl 3():S156-63. PubMed ID: 21943969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer. Gregory TA; Wilson C; Duncan A; Turnbull D; Cole SR; Young G BMC Public Health; 2011 Jan; 11():38. PubMed ID: 21232156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Screening and primary prevention of colorectal cancer: a review of sex-specific and site-specific differences. Massat NJ; Moss SM; Halloran SP; Duffy SW J Med Screen; 2013; 20(3):125-48. PubMed ID: 24197771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening. Segnan N; Senore C; Andreoni B; Azzoni A; Bisanti L; Cardelli A; Castiglione G; Crosta C; Ederle A; Fantin A; Ferrari A; Fracchia M; Ferrero F; Gasperoni S; Recchia S; Risio M; Rubeca T; Saracco G; Zappa M; Gastroenterology; 2007 Jun; 132(7):2304-12. PubMed ID: 17570205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Screening for colorectal cancer in Italy: 2004 survey. Zorzi M; Grazzini G; Senore C; Vettorazzi M Epidemiol Prev; 2006; 30(1 Suppl 3):41-50. PubMed ID: 16937845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]