These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26868004)

  • 1. On the Differentiation of Foveal and Peripheral Early Visual Evoked Potentials.
    Hansen BC; Haun AM; Johnson AP; Ellemberg D
    Brain Topogr; 2016 Jul; 29(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 26868004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of attention on pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials: foveal field stimulation versus peripheral field stimulation.
    Hoshiyama M; Kakigi R
    Brain Topogr; 2001; 13(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 11545158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early spatial attentional modulation of inputs to the fovea.
    Frey HP; Kelly SP; Lalor EC; Foxe JJ
    J Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 30(13):4547-51. PubMed ID: 20357105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A short latency cortical component of the foveal VEP is revealed by hemifield stimulation.
    Bodis-Wollner I; Brannan JR; Nicoll J; Frkovic S; Mylin LH
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992; 84(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 1375879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retinotopy of emotion: Perception of negatively valenced stimuli presented at different spatial locations as revealed by event-related potentials.
    Carretié L; Méndez-Bértolo C; Bódalo C; Hernández-Lorca M; Fernández-Folgueiras U; Fondevila S; Giménez-Fernández T
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 May; 41(7):1711-1724. PubMed ID: 31860166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The time course of visual competition to the presentation of centrally fixated faces.
    Jacques C; Rossion B
    J Vis; 2006 Feb; 6(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 16522142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foveal attention modulates responses to peripheral stimuli.
    Vanni S; Uutela K
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2443-52. PubMed ID: 10758145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The human motion onset VEP as a function of stimulation area for foveal and peripheral vision.
    Göpfert E; Müller R; Simon EM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1990 Sep; 75(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 2276317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cerebral refractory period of visual evoked potentials following total field and foveal stimulation].
    Gerhard H; Jörg J; Friesacher H
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1985 Jun; 16(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 3930216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual evoked potentials generator model derived from different spatial frequency stimuli of visual field regions and magnetic resonance imaging coordinates of V1, V2, V3 areas in man.
    Onofrj M; Fulgente T; Thomas A; Curatola L; Peresson M; Lopez L; Locatelli T; Martinelli V; Comi G
    Int J Neurosci; 1995 Dec; 83(3-4):213-39. PubMed ID: 8869429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scalp distribution of visual evoked potentials to foveal pattern and luminance stimuli.
    Edwards L; Drasdo N
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1987 Aug; 66(4):301-11. PubMed ID: 3428084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peripheral resolution and contrast sensitivity: Effects of stimulus drift.
    Venkataraman AP; Lewis P; Unsbo P; Lundström L
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():145-149. PubMed ID: 28268102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Steady-state VECPs to foveal and parafoveal stimulation of the upper hemiretina.
    Kakisu Y
    Ophthalmic Res; 1983; 15(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 6877755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Fixation Distance to the Stimulus Influences ERP Quality: An EEG and Eye Tracking N400 Study.
    Domínguez-Martínez E; Parise E; Strandvall T; Reid VM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134339. PubMed ID: 26222059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foveal and parafoveal spatial attention and its impact on the processing of facial expression: an ERP study.
    Wijers AA; Banis S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 123(3):513-26. PubMed ID: 21889396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the Wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings.
    Porciatti V; Fontanesi G; Raffaelli A; Bagnoli P
    Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 2340414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retinocortical gain in the foveal pathway: the effect of spatial frequency and stimulus size.
    Mari Z; Sagliocco L; Bodis-Wollner I
    Clin Electroencephalogr; 2001 Apr; 32(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 11360723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. I. Normal hearing adults.
    Neville HJ; Lawson D
    Brain Res; 1987 Mar; 405(2):253-67. PubMed ID: 3567604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Foveal evoked magneto-encephalography features related to the parvocellular pathway.
    Yang CY; Hsieh JC; Chang Y
    Vis Neurosci; 2008; 25(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18442440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological correlates of target eccentricity in texture segmentation.
    Schaffer S; Schubö A; Meinecke C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Jun; 80(3):198-209. PubMed ID: 21419177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.