These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 268686)

  • 1. A matrix system for class II amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Gustafsson U; Magnusson B
    Swed Dent J; 1977; 1(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 268686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Approximating class II amalgam restorations for primary molars.
    Hill CJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1973 Jan; 17(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 4508942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A two-year clinical study of a carvable composite resin used as class II restorations in primary molars.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G; Chambers DW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 7002965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors producing failure of class II silver amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Myers DR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1977; 44(3):226-9. PubMed ID: 325041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The atomic matrix in Class II and mod silver amalgam restorations.
    Sobel M
    Diastema; 1975; 4(3):29-31. PubMed ID: 1073371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Materials and techniques for restoration of primary molars by pediatric dentists in Florida.
    Guelmann M; Mjör IA
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 12212875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Materials used to restore class II lesions in primary molars: a survey of California pediatric dentists.
    Pair RL; Udin RD; Tanbonliong T
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 15646912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The teaching of Class I and II restorations in primary molars: a survey of North American dental schools.
    Guelmann M; Mjör IA; Jerrell GR
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 11699164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Hickel R; Voss A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW; Richardson AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
    Dutta BN; Gauba K; Tewari A; Chawla HS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pre-contoured matrix bands for Class II amalgam restorations.
    Graham DA; Daniels JA; Kahl EA; Pelzner RB; Birtcil RF
    Gen Dent; 1980; 28(3):52-7. PubMed ID: 6936329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Amalgam fillings in the deciduous and mixed dentition--a post-treatment evaluation of service life and quality].
    Pieper K; Beinhauer A; Redeker M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Sep; 46(9):606-8. PubMed ID: 1817941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of amalgam and stainless steel restorations for primary molars.
    Dawson LR; Simon JF; Taylor PP
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1981; 48(6):420-2. PubMed ID: 6946083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modified matrix adaptation for sub-gingival Class II amalgam restorations.
    Chan DC
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):469-72. PubMed ID: 12877435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Study of marginal fractures of amalgam restoration in the deciduous teeth. 1. Marginal angles of amalgam restoration in the deciduous molars].
    Machida Y; Imanishi T; Yakushi M
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1969 Jun; 69(6):940-8. PubMed ID: 5258264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.
    Holan G; Chosack A; Eidelman E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.