223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26869461)
1. Age-stratified trends in 20 years of stress incontinence surgery in Australia.
Brown J; King J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Apr; 56(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 26869461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress urinary incontinence in the mesh complication era: current Australian trends.
Mathieson R; Kippen R; Manning T; Brennan J
BJU Int; 2021 Jul; 128(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 33226698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of the British Association of Urological Surgeons female stress urinary incontinence procedures outcomes audit 2014-2017.
Cashman S; Biers S; Greenwell T; Harding C; Morley R; Cooper D; Fowler S; Thiruchelvam N;
BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):149-159. PubMed ID: 30222915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Bladder injury during sling operation in the treatment of SUI--review of literature and case report].
Gałczyński K; Futyma K; Bar K; Rechberger T
Ginekol Pol; 2012 Oct; 83(10):784-8. PubMed ID: 23383566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in reoperation for female stress urinary incontinence: A nationwide study.
Wu MP; Long CY; Liang CC; Weng SF; Tong YC
Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Sep; 34(7):693-8. PubMed ID: 25067811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changing surgical trends for female stress urinary incontinence in England.
Zacche MM; Mukhopadhyay S; Giarenis I
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Feb; 30(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 30523375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The distribution of different surgical types for female stress urinary incontinence among patients' age, surgeons' specialties and hospital accreditations in Taiwan: a descriptive 10-year nationwide study.
Wu MP; Huang KH; Long CY; Huang KF; Yu KJ; Tang CH
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1639-46. PubMed ID: 18696003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are older women more likely to receive surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence since the introduction of the mid-urethral sling? An examination of Hospital Episode Statistics data.
Gibson W; Wagg A
BJOG; 2016 Jul; 123(8):1386-92. PubMed ID: 25752477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical management of urinary stress incontinence - Where are we now?
Dwyer PL; Karmakar D
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 54():31-40. PubMed ID: 30503362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery at a Tertiary Center: Midurethral Sling Use Following the AUGS/SUFU Position Statement.
Palmerola R; Peyronnet B; Rebolos M; Khan A; Sussman RD; Escobar C; Smith S; Rosenblum N; Nitti VW
Urology; 2019 Sep; 131():71-76. PubMed ID: 31229514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midterm postoperative results of mid-urethral slings. Role of ultrasound in explaining surgical failures.
Escura S; Ros C; Anglès-Acedo S; Bataller E; Sánchez E; Carmona F; Espuña-Pons M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2022 Nov; 41(8):1834-1843. PubMed ID: 36057980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sling Procedures for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Comparison of National Practice Patterns between Urologists and Gynecologists.
James MB; Theofanides MC; Sui W; Onyeji I; Badalato GM; Chung DE
J Urol; 2017 Dec; 198(6):1386-1391. PubMed ID: 28684228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing trends in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence--twenty two years observation.
Rechberger T; Futyma K; Miotła P; Adamiak A; Tomaszewski J; Skorupski P; Wróbel A; Postawski K; Jakowicki JA
Ginekol Pol; 2008 Jan; 79(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 18510048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What a mesh! An Australian experience using national female continence surgery trends over 20 years.
McVey A; Qu LG; Chan G; Perera M; Brennan J; Chung E; Gani J
World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3931-3938. PubMed ID: 33837448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexual function after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: vaginal sling versus Burch colposuspension.
Cayan F; Dilek S; Akbay E; Cayan S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 277(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17653739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing risk of repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence after mid-urethral slings and polyacrylamide hydrogel.
Svenningsen R; Oversand SH; Schiøtz HA; Kulseng-Hanssen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Dec; 100(12):2186-2192. PubMed ID: 34622944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical trends in the correction of female stress urinary incontinence in academic centers within the United States.
Cantrell AB; Rothschild J; Durbin-Johnson B; Gonzalez R; Kurzrock EA
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Feb; 36(2):394-398. PubMed ID: 26678562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complications of Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence Among Female Military Beneficiaries.
Howard DL; McGlynn A; Greer JA
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Jun; 27(6):830-835. PubMed ID: 29320304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of time to release of an obstructing synthetic mid-urethral sling on repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
Abraham N; Makovey I; King A; Goldman HB; Vasavada S
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Feb; 36(2):349-353. PubMed ID: 26588591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characteristics of Providers Performing Urogynecologic Procedures on Medicare Patients 2012-2014.
Stone DE; Barenberg BJ; Pickett SD; OʼLeary DE; Quiroz LH
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(2):75-79. PubMed ID: 28230614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
