These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26869503)

  • 1. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
    Garcés JB; Winson I; Goldhahn S; Castro MD; Swords MP; Grujic L; Rammelt S; Sands AK
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 26869503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
    Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Schnurr C; Lüring C; König D; Bouillon B
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jun; 25(3):361-365. PubMed ID: 30321978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery.
    Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
    Foot (Edinb); 2011 Jun; 21(2):92-102. PubMed ID: 21602039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus.
    Dawson J; Doll H; Coffey J; Jenkinson C;
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2007 Aug; 15(8):918-31. PubMed ID: 17383907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
    Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Ringendahl H; Bouillon B; Eysel P; König D
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Dec; 24(6):481-485. PubMed ID: 29409194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery.
    Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 22323689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dutch Translation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire: Reassessment of Reliability and Validity.
    Venkatesan S; Schotanus MG; Hendrickx RP
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(6):1199-1201. PubMed ID: 27623564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally important change was estimated for the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire after foot/ankle surgery.
    Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):697-705. PubMed ID: 24709030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and psychometric performance of the French language version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ).
    Vieira Cardoso D; Dubois-Ferrière V; Hannouche D; Lübbeke A; Perneger T
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2020 Dec; 26(8):902-906. PubMed ID: 31882344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) into Persian language.
    Mousavian A; Ebrahimzadeh MH; Birjandinejad A; Omidi-Kashani F; Kachooei AR
    Foot (Edinb); 2015 Dec; 25(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 26365951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire for hallux valgus deformity evaluation.
    Talu B; Bayramlar K; Bek N; Yakut Y
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016; 50(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 26969957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese version (MOXFQ-Ch): a validity and cross-cultural adaptation.
    Ruiz-Muñoz M; González-Sánchez M; Li GZ; Cuesta-Vargas AI
    Disabil Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 43(1):104-111. PubMed ID: 31116950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome Assessment Performance of the SF-36, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire and AOFAS in Forefoot Reconstruction Surgery.
    Adames DNB; González-Lucena G; Ruales JIS; Cudos BG; Ginés-Cespedosa A
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2022; 61(2):248-252. PubMed ID: 34364761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale (AOFAS-MTP-IP) for the hallux.
    Kalaycıoğlu O; Ayanoğlu T; Yılmaz ÖF; Turhan MT
    Jt Dis Relat Surg; 2023 May; 34(2):305-314. PubMed ID: 37462633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Korean Version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire in Patients With Hallux Valgus.
    Park MJ; Ko YC; Huh JW; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):252-254. PubMed ID: 28231961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus.
    Dawson J; Coffey J; Doll H; Lavis G; Cooke P; Herron M; Jenkinson C
    Qual Life Res; 2006 Sep; 15(7):1211-22. PubMed ID: 17001437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS).
    Cöster MC; Rosengren BE; Bremander A; Brudin L; Karlsson MK
    Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Oct; 35(10):1031-6. PubMed ID: 25015390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Joint Scale.
    Ziroglu N; Birinci T; Koluman A; Şahbaz Y; Çiftçi MU; Baca E; Duramaz A
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2023 Nov; ():19386400231214285. PubMed ID: 38018560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery.
    SooHoo NF; Vyas R; Samimi D
    Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Nov; 27(11):930-4. PubMed ID: 17144955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons-Foot and Ankle Module (AAOS-FAMsp).
    González-Sánchez M; Velasco-Ramos E; Ruiz-Muñoz M; Cuesta-Vargas AI
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Jul; 11(1):74. PubMed ID: 27384181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.