215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26869503)
1. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
Garcés JB; Winson I; Goldhahn S; Castro MD; Swords MP; Grujic L; Rammelt S; Sands AK
Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 26869503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Schnurr C; Lüring C; König D; Bouillon B
Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jun; 25(3):361-365. PubMed ID: 30321978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery.
Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
Foot (Edinb); 2011 Jun; 21(2):92-102. PubMed ID: 21602039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus.
Dawson J; Doll H; Coffey J; Jenkinson C;
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2007 Aug; 15(8):918-31. PubMed ID: 17383907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Ringendahl H; Bouillon B; Eysel P; König D
Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Dec; 24(6):481-485. PubMed ID: 29409194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery.
Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 22323689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dutch Translation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire: Reassessment of Reliability and Validity.
Venkatesan S; Schotanus MG; Hendrickx RP
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(6):1199-1201. PubMed ID: 27623564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally important change was estimated for the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire after foot/ankle surgery.
Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):697-705. PubMed ID: 24709030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and psychometric performance of the French language version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ).
Vieira Cardoso D; Dubois-Ferrière V; Hannouche D; Lübbeke A; Perneger T
Foot Ankle Surg; 2020 Dec; 26(8):902-906. PubMed ID: 31882344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) into Persian language.
Mousavian A; Ebrahimzadeh MH; Birjandinejad A; Omidi-Kashani F; Kachooei AR
Foot (Edinb); 2015 Dec; 25(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 26365951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire for hallux valgus deformity evaluation.
Talu B; Bayramlar K; Bek N; Yakut Y
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016; 50(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 26969957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese version (MOXFQ-Ch): a validity and cross-cultural adaptation.
Ruiz-Muñoz M; González-Sánchez M; Li GZ; Cuesta-Vargas AI
Disabil Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 43(1):104-111. PubMed ID: 31116950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome Assessment Performance of the SF-36, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire and AOFAS in Forefoot Reconstruction Surgery.
Adames DNB; González-Lucena G; Ruales JIS; Cudos BG; Ginés-Cespedosa A
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2022; 61(2):248-252. PubMed ID: 34364761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale (AOFAS-MTP-IP) for the hallux.
Kalaycıoğlu O; Ayanoğlu T; Yılmaz ÖF; Turhan MT
Jt Dis Relat Surg; 2023 May; 34(2):305-314. PubMed ID: 37462633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Korean Version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire in Patients With Hallux Valgus.
Park MJ; Ko YC; Huh JW; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):252-254. PubMed ID: 28231961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus.
Dawson J; Coffey J; Doll H; Lavis G; Cooke P; Herron M; Jenkinson C
Qual Life Res; 2006 Sep; 15(7):1211-22. PubMed ID: 17001437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS).
Cöster MC; Rosengren BE; Bremander A; Brudin L; Karlsson MK
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Oct; 35(10):1031-6. PubMed ID: 25015390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Joint Scale.
Ziroglu N; Birinci T; Koluman A; Şahbaz Y; Çiftçi MU; Baca E; Duramaz A
Foot Ankle Spec; 2023 Nov; ():19386400231214285. PubMed ID: 38018560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery.
SooHoo NF; Vyas R; Samimi D
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Nov; 27(11):930-4. PubMed ID: 17144955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons-Foot and Ankle Module (AAOS-FAMsp).
González-Sánchez M; Velasco-Ramos E; Ruiz-Muñoz M; Cuesta-Vargas AI
J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Jul; 11(1):74. PubMed ID: 27384181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
