159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26870163)
1. CT pelvimetry and clinicopathological parameters in evaluation of the technical difficulties in performing open rectal surgery for mid-low rectal cancer.
Zhou XC; Su M; Hu KQ; Su YF; Ye YH; Huang CQ; Yu ZL; Li XY; Zhou H; Ni YZ; Jiang YI; Lou Z
Oncol Lett; 2016 Jan; 11(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 26870163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Computed tomography pelvimetry as a predictor of technical difficulty in total mesorectal excision].
Yan HH; Lou Z; Sheng J; Zhang W; Fu CG; Meng RG
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 14(11):846-50. PubMed ID: 22116717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis" is not a contraindication.
Ogiso S; Yamaguchi T; Hata H; Fukuda M; Ikai I; Yamato T; Sakai Y
Surg Endosc; 2011 Jun; 25(6):1907-12. PubMed ID: 21136101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Applications of computed tomography pelvimetry and clinical-pathological parameters in sphincter preservation of mid-low rectal cancer.
Zhou X; Su M; Hu K; Su Y; Ye Y; Huang C; Yu Z; Li X; Zhou H; Ni Y; Jiang Y
Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(2):2174-81. PubMed ID: 25932148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sacrococcygeal dimensions and curvature are associated with resection quality in rectal cancer excision.
Simpson G; Marks T; Blacker S; Smith D; Walsh C
Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 32594270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy.
Targarona EM; Balague C; Pernas JC; Martinez C; Berindoague R; Gich I; Trias M
Ann Surg; 2008 Apr; 247(4):642-9. PubMed ID: 18362627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Predictive value of MRI pelvic measurements for "difficult pelvis" during total mesorectal excision].
Sun Z; Hou WY; Liu JJ; Xue HD; Xu PR; Wu B; Lin GL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 25(12):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 36562232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pelvic inlet shape measured by three-dimensional pelvimetry is a predictor of the operative time in the anterior resection of rectal cancer.
Shimada T; Tsuruta M; Hasegawa H; Okabayashi K; Ishida T; Asada Y; Suzumura H; Kitagawa Y
Surg Today; 2018 Jan; 48(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 28597348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer.
Akiyoshi T; Kuroyanagi H; Oya M; Konishi T; Fukuda M; Fujimoto Y; Ueno M; Miyata S; Yamaguchi T
Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 19715805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection].
Wu H; Zhang T; Chen X; Jing X; Cheng X; Song Z; Zhu L; He Y; Ji X; Zhang H; Zhao R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):779-785. PubMed ID: 30051446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry in 186 patients with rectal cancer confirms an overlap in pelvic size between males and females.
Salerno G; Daniels IR; Brown G; Heald RJ; Moran BJ
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):772-6. PubMed ID: 17032323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review.
Hong JS; Brown KGM; Waller J; Young CJ; Solomon MJ
Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 32623536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry predicts the technical difficulty of rectal surgery.
Ma Q; Cheng J; Bao Y; Gao Z; Jiang K; Wang S; Ye Y; Wang Y; Shen Z
Asian J Surg; 2022 Dec; 45(12):2626-2632. PubMed ID: 34961711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D pelvimetry and biometric measurements: a surgical perspective for colorectal resections.
Lorenzon L; Bini F; Landolfi F; Quinzi S; Balducci G; Marinozzi F; Biondi A; Persiani R; D'Ugo D; Tirelli F; Iannicelli E
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 May; 36(5):977-986. PubMed ID: 33230658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gender differences in pelvic anatomy and effects on rectal cancer surgery.
Seike K; Koda K; Oda K; Kosugi C; Shimizu K; Miyazaki M
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(89):111-5. PubMed ID: 19453039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer.
Boyle KM; Petty D; Chalmers AG; Quirke P; Cairns A; Finan PJ; Sagar PM; Burke D
Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 15859960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of pelvic dimensions on anastomotic leak after anterior resection for patients with rectal cancer.
Yu ZL; Liu XH; Liu HS; Ke J; Zou YF; Cao WT; Xiao J; Zhou ZY; Lan P; Wu XJ; Wu XR
Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2134-2143. PubMed ID: 32410082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What affects the selection of diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study.
Wang Z; Guo Y; Li S; He L; Zhao Y; Wang Q
BMC Surg; 2024 Jan; 24(1):30. PubMed ID: 38263089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can CT Pelvimetry Be Used to Predict Circumferential Resection Margin Positivity in Laparoscopic Resection of Middle and Lower Rectum Cancer?
Gojayev A; Yuksel C; Akbulut S; Erşen O; Bakırarar B; Gülpınar B; Gürsoy Çoruh A; Unal AE; Demirci S
Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31745. PubMed ID: 36569682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Prognosis factors for the perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer].
Luo S; Liang JW; Zhou HT; Pei W; Zhou ZX; Liu Q; Wang XS
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 55(11):842-846. PubMed ID: 29136732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
