212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26871584)
21. Days of prophylactic filgrastim use to reduce febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with chemotherapy.
Scott SD; Chrischilles EA; Link BK; Delgado DJ; Fridman M; Stolshek BS
J Manag Care Pharm; 2003; 9(2 Suppl):15-21. PubMed ID: 14613340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF in early-stage breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in China].
Xia W; Wang SS; Hu H; Zhao FL; Xu F; Hong RX; Jiang KK; Yuan ZY; Shi YX; Zhao K; Huang JJ; Xue C; Bi XW; Lu QY; An X; Zhang JM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 42(10):861-867. PubMed ID: 33113628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving FEC-D.
Lee EK; Wong WW; Trudeau ME; Chan KK
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Feb; 150(1):169-80. PubMed ID: 25694355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Factors for the optimal selection of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor preparations and predictors for R-CHOP dose reductions/delays among patients with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (STOP FN in NHL 2 subanalysis).
Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Nukada T; Hatake K; Terui Y
BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):358. PubMed ID: 33823836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma: an economic evaluation of the PALM Trial.
Perrier L; Lefranc A; Pérol D; Quittet P; Schmidt-Tanguy A; Siani C; de Peretti C; Favier B; Biron P; Moreau P; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Jardin F; Espinouse D; Sebban C
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 23435861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Conversion from pegfilgrastim with on-body injector to pegfilgrastim-jmdb: cost-efficiency analysis and budget-neutral expanded access to prophylaxis and treatment.
McBride A; MacDonald K; Fuentes-Alburo A; Abraham I
J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):598-606. PubMed ID: 33866947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices.
Rifkin RM; Crawford J; Mahtani RL; Dale DC; Narang M; MacLaughlin WW; Huynh C; Gawade PL; Lewis S; DeCosta L; Lawrence T; Belani R
Support Care Cancer; 2022 Oct; 30(10):7913-7922. PubMed ID: 35732748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost effectiveness of primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer at risk of febrile neutropenia.
Aarts MJ; Grutters JP; Peters FP; Mandigers CM; Dercksen MW; Stouthard JM; Nortier HJ; van Laarhoven HW; van Warmerdam LJ; van de Wouw AJ; Jacobs EM; Mattijssen V; van der Rijt CC; Smilde TJ; van der Velden AW; Temizkan M; Batman E; Muller EW; van Gastel SM; Joore MA; Borm GF; Tjan-Heijnen VC
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 31(34):4283-9. PubMed ID: 24166522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Front-line immunochemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma using dose-dense rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and pegfilgrastim as support.
Cabanillas F; Cotto M; Liboy I; Rivera E; Pavia OA; Bruno M
Leuk Lymphoma; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1929-33. PubMed ID: 22448918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis Is Effective in the Prevention of Febrile Neutropenia and Reduces Mortality in Patients Aged ≥ 75 Years with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-CHOP: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Jeong SH; Kim SJ; Yoon DH; Park Y; Kang HJ; Koh Y; Lee GW; Lee WS; Yang DH; Do YR; Kim MK; Yoo KH; Choi YS; Yun HJ; Yi JH; Jo JC; Eom HS; Kwak JY; Shin HJ; Park BB; Hyun SY; Yi SY; Kwon JH; Oh SY; Kim HJ; Sohn BS; Won JH; Kim SH; Lee HS; Suh C; Kim WS
Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Oct; 54(4):1268-1277. PubMed ID: 34990525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
Danova M; Chiroli S; Rosti G; Doan QV
Tumori; 2009; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost-benefit analysis of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during CHOP antineoplastic therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Dranitsaris G; Altmayer C; Quirt I
Pharmacoeconomics; 1997 Jun; 11(6):566-77. PubMed ID: 10173030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of filgrastim versus pegfilgrastim on outcomes of DA-R-EPOCH for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Roder L; Konrardy K; Grauer D; Hoffmann M
Support Care Cancer; 2021 Sep; 29(9):5075-5082. PubMed ID: 33594515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Retrospective analysis of relative dose intensity in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving CHOP-based chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim.
Balducci L; Mo M; Abella E; Saven A
Am J Clin Oncol; 2014 Dec; 37(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 25350463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Incidence and risk factors for febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP: 2-year experience in a single center (STOP FN in NHL 2).
Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Nishihara A; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Terui Y; Nukada T; Nomura T; Hatake K
Support Care Cancer; 2020 Feb; 28(2):571-579. PubMed ID: 31093770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predictive Parameters of Febrile Neutropenia and Clinical Significance of G-CSF Receptor Signaling Pathway in the Development of Neutropenia during R-CHOP Chemotherapy with Prophylactic Pegfilgrastim in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Kim DY; Nam J; Chung JS; Jeon BE; Lee JH; Jo JC; Kim SW; Shin HJ
Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Oct; 54(4):1256-1267. PubMed ID: 34990523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany].
Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer in the United Kingdom.
Whyte S; Cooper KL; Stevenson MD; Madan J; Akehurst R
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):465-74. PubMed ID: 21669371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
