These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26872100)

  • 1. Electrophysiological evidence that top-down knowledge controls working memory processing for subsequent visual search.
    Kawashima T; Matsumoto E
    Neuroreport; 2016 Mar; 27(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 26872100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is a search template an ordinary working memory? Comparing electrophysiological markers of working memory maintenance for visual search and recognition.
    Gunseli E; Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jul; 60():29-38. PubMed ID: 24878275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of working memory representations in the control of attention.
    Woodman GF; Luck SJ; Schall JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Sep; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i118-24. PubMed ID: 17725994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does Contralateral Delay Activity Reflect Working Memory Storage or the Current Focus of Spatial Attention within Visual Working Memory?
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 28(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27458749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.
    Scalf PE; Dux PE; Marois R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2593-604. PubMed ID: 21281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological evidence supports the role of sustained visuospatial attention in maintaining visual WM contents.
    Liang T; Chen X; Ye C; Zhang J; Liu Q
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():54-62. PubMed ID: 31639381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
    Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reward associations impact both iconic and visual working memory.
    Infanti E; Hickey C; Turatto M
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():22-9. PubMed ID: 25481632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations.
    van Ede F; Niklaus M; Nobre AC
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(2):437-445. PubMed ID: 28077721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
    Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Independent Attention Mechanisms Control the Activation of Tactile and Visual Working Memory Representations.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 May; 30(5):644-655. PubMed ID: 29346019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not.
    Olivers CN; Peters J; Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):327-34. PubMed ID: 21665518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.