159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26872535)
1. Comparative prognostic relevance of breast intra-tumoral microvessel density evaluated by CD105 and CD146: A pilot study of 42 cases.
Martinez LM; Labovsky V; Calcagno Mde L; Davies KM; Rivello HG; Wernicke A; Calvo JC; Chasseing NA
Pathol Res Pract; 2016 Apr; 212(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 26872535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased expression of CD146 and microvessel density (MVD) in invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: Comparative study with invasive ductal carcinoma-not otherwise specified.
Li W; Yang D; Wang S; Guo X; Lang R; Fan Y; Gu F; Zhang X; Niu Y; Yan X; Fu L
Pathol Res Pract; 2011 Dec; 207(12):739-46. PubMed ID: 22051146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphometric and immunohistochemical study of angiogenic marker expressions in invasive ductal carcinoma of human breast.
Safwat MD; Habib F; Elayat A; Oweiss N; Reffat S; Algaidi S
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2009 Aug; 68(3):144-55. PubMed ID: 19722158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microvessel Landscape Assessment in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Unclear Value of Targeting Endoglin (CD105) as Prognostic Factor of Clinical Outcome.
Lytras D; Leontara V; Kefala M; Foukas PG; Giannakou N; Pouliakis A; Dervenis C; Panayiotides IG; Karakitsos P
Pancreas; 2015 Jan; 44(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 25058886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microvessel density assessment in benign and malignant endometrial changes.
Czekierdowski A; Czekierdowska S; Czuba B; Cnota W; Sodowski K; Kotarski J; Zwirska-Korczala K
J Physiol Pharmacol; 2008 Sep; 59 Suppl 4():45-51. PubMed ID: 18955753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic relevance of CD105-assessed microvessel density in laryngeal carcinoma.
Zvrko E; Mikic A; Vuckovic L; Djukic V; Knezevic M
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Oct; 141(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 19786216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic assay for invasive ductal breast carcinoma.
Axelsson K; Ljung BM; Moore DH; Thor AD; Chew KL; Edgerton SM; Smith HS; Mayall BH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 Jul; 87(13):997-1008. PubMed ID: 7543156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast carcinoma vascularity: a comparison of manual microvessel count and Chalkley count.
Dhakal HP; Bassarova A; Naume B; Synnestvedt M; Borgen E; Kaaresen R; Schlichting E; Wiedswang G; Giercksky KE; Nesland JM
Histol Histopathol; 2009 Aug; 24(8):1049-59. PubMed ID: 19554512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The immunohistochemical expression of CD105 is a marker for high metastatic risk and worse prognosis in breast cancers].
Charpin-Taranger C; Dales JP; Garcia S; Andrac-Meyer L; Ramuz O; Carpentier-Meunier S; Bonnier P
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2003; 187(6):1129-45; discussion 1145-6. PubMed ID: 14978873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Density of microvessels positive for CD105 (endoglin) is related to prognosis in meningiomas.
Barresi V; Cerasoli S; Vitarelli E; Tuccari G
Acta Neuropathol; 2007 Aug; 114(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 17594108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and angiogenesis: prognostic markers for breast cancer.
Zhou S; Wang GP; Liu C; Zhou M
BMC Cancer; 2006 Sep; 6():231. PubMed ID: 17010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Microvessel Density with Prognostic Factors in Invasive Ductal Carcinomas of the Breast.
Şener E; Şipal S; Gündoğdu C
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2016; 32(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 27562390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of visual and automated assessment of microvessel density and their impact on outcome in primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer.
Mohammed ZM; Orange C; McMillan DC; Mallon E; Doughty JC; Edwards J; Going JJ
Hum Pathol; 2013 Aug; 44(8):1688-95. PubMed ID: 23574778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoglin is a better marker than CD31 in evaluation of angiogenesis in glioblastoma.
Behrem S; Zarkovic K; Eskinja N; Jonjic N
Croat Med J; 2005 Jun; 46(3):417-22. PubMed ID: 15861521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic relevance of CD105+ microvessel density in HNSCC patient outcome.
Martone T; Rosso P; Albera R; Migliaretti G; Fraire F; Pignataro L; Pruneri G; Bellone G; Cortesina G
Oral Oncol; 2005 Feb; 41(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 15695116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CD105 expression on CD34-negative spindle-shaped stromal cells of primary tumor is an unfavorable prognostic marker in early breast cancer patients.
Martinez LM; Labovsky V; Calcagno ML; Davies KM; Garcia Rivello H; Bianchi MS; Wernicke A; Fernández Vallone VB; Chasseing NA
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121421. PubMed ID: 25803686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microvessel density compared with the Chalkley count in a prognostic study of angiogenesis in breast cancer patients.
Hansen S; Sørensen FB; Vach W; Grabau DA; Bak M; Rose C
Histopathology; 2004 May; 44(5):428-36. PubMed ID: 15139990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of microvessel density determined by CD34 or CD105 in benign and malignant gastric lesions.
Ding S; Li C; Lin S; Yang Y; Liu D; Han Y; Zhang Y; Li L; Zhou L; Kumar S
Hum Pathol; 2006 Jul; 37(7):861-6. PubMed ID: 16784986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gli1 is a potential cancer stem cell marker and predicts poor prognosis in ductal breast carcinoma.
Ni W; Yang Z; Qi W; Cui C; Cui Y; Xuan Y
Hum Pathol; 2017 Nov; 69():38-45. PubMed ID: 28965964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoglin (CD105) positive microvessel density and its relationship with lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.
Eshghyar N; Mohammadi N; Rahrotaban S; Motahhary P; Vahedi Vaez SM
Arch Iran Med; 2011 Jul; 14(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 21726105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
