These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2687347)

  • 21. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of different amalgams with different liners.
    Gallato A; Angnes G; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):571-6. PubMed ID: 15942619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
    Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage of different amalgams bonded with dual cure resin cements.
    Lombard R; du Preez IC; Oberholzer TG
    SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):056, 058-61. PubMed ID: 17624174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal leakage in amalgam restorations and its prevention.
    Ben-Amar A; Kaffe I; Gorfil C
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim; 1978 Jul; 27(3):25-9, 23-5. PubMed ID: 367984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison Of Frequency Of Post Operative Sensitivity In Amalgam Restorations Using Copal Varnish And Dentin Adhesive Liner.
    Saba K; Maxood A; Abdullah S; Riaz A; Din SU
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2018; 30(2):163-166. PubMed ID: 29938411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations.
    Charlton DG; Moore BK; Swartz ML
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 1437693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Experimental adhesive sealing agents reduce marginal microleakage around amalgam restorations--an in vitro pilot study.
    Liberman R; Goldstein L; Zilberman J
    Refuat Hashinayim; 1989 Apr; 7(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 2637789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long term sealing properties of Amalgambond under amalgam restorations.
    Ben-Amar A; Liberman R; Rothkoff Z; Cardash HS
    Am J Dent; 1994 Jun; 7(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 7993602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of 4-META adhesive on bond strength and marginal seal of amalgam restorations and repairs--an in vitro study.
    George S; Kuriakose S; Jayalatha NS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1996 Jun; 14(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 9522758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adaptation and condensation of amalgam restorations in Class II preparations of conventional and conservative design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 1410252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Varnish application technique and microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ben-Amar A; Cardash HS; Liberman R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Apr; 6(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 8397984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bonding of amalgam to dentine: microleakage and shear bond strength evaluation.
    van der Vyver PJ; de Wet FA; Kearney WD; de Nysschen D
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Aug; 51(8):531-5. PubMed ID: 9461930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage of amalgam cavity treatment systems: an in vitro evaluation.
    Morrow LA; Wilson NH; Setcos JC; Watts DC
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 12572646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage of amalgam alloys: an update.
    Mahler DB; Bryant RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 127(9):1351-6. PubMed ID: 8854611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experimental use of a bonding agent to reduce marginal microleakage in amalgam restorations.
    Yu XY; Wei G; Xu JW
    Quintessence Int; 1987 Nov; 18(11):783-7. PubMed ID: 3333855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Amalgam Restorations: To Bond or Not.
    Larson TD
    Northwest Dent; 2015; 94(5):35-7. PubMed ID: 26596104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gallium alloy versus high copper amalgam: a comparative evaluation of corrosion resistance and microleakage in the primary teeth.
    Munshi AK; Hegde AM; Bhaskar S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 11314418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.