These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26873785)

  • 1. Assessment of ionization chamber correction factors in photon beams using a time saving strategy with PENELOPE code.
    Reis CQ; Nicolucci P
    Phys Med; 2016 Feb; 32(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 26873785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo calculations for reference dosimetry of electron beams with the PTW Roos and NE2571 ion chambers.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121722. PubMed ID: 24320508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte-Carlo-based perturbation and beam quality correction factors for thimble ionization chambers in high-energy photon beams.
    Wulff J; Heverhagen JT; Zink K
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(11):2823-36. PubMed ID: 18460747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5939-50. PubMed ID: 21158307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors for PTW cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams.
    Giménez-Alventosa V; Giménez V; Ballester F; Vijande J; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Oct; 65(20):205005. PubMed ID: 32434170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of ICRU report 90 recommendations on Monte Carlo calculated k
    Kawachi T; Saitoh H; Katayose T; Tohyama N; Miyasaka R; Cho SY; Iwase T; Hara R
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5185-5194. PubMed ID: 31386762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Photon beam quality correction factors for the NE2571A and NE2581A thimble ionization chambers using PENELOPE.
    Erazo F; Lallena AM
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):232-6. PubMed ID: 26602965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calculation of k
    Pimpinella M; Silvi L; Pinto M
    Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():221-230. PubMed ID: 30660374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the wall perturbation correction for a parallel-plate NACP-02 chamber in clinical electron beams.
    Zink K; Wulff J
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):1045-54. PubMed ID: 21452742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consistency in quality correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in scanned proton beam therapy.
    Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Bertrand D; Lee JA; Palmans H; Vynckier S; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4919-4927. PubMed ID: 28656604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The perturbation correction factors for cylindrical ionization chambers in high-energy photon beams.
    Yoshiyama F; Araki F; Ono T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2010 Jul; 3(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 20821090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for two cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams.
    Alissa M; Zink K; Tessier F; Schoenfeld AA; Czarnecki D
    Phys Med; 2022 Feb; 94():17-23. PubMed ID: 34972070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The central electrode correction factor for high-Z electrodes in small ionization chambers.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):1081-8. PubMed ID: 21452745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Output correction factors for nine small field detectors in 6 MV radiation therapy photon beams: a PENELOPE Monte Carlo study.
    Benmakhlouf H; Sempau J; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041711. PubMed ID: 24694131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beam quality conversion factors for parallel-plate ionization chambers in MV photon beams.
    Muir BR; McEwen MR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1618-31. PubMed ID: 22380394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of penh, fluka, and Geant4/topas for absorbed dose calculations in air cavities representing ionization chambers in high-energy photon and proton beams.
    Baumann KS; Horst F; Zink K; Gomà C
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4639-4653. PubMed ID: 31350915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo simulated beam quality and perturbation correction factors for ionization chambers in monoenergetic proton beams.
    Kretschmer J; Dulkys A; Brodbek L; Stelljes TS; Looe HK; Poppe B
    Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5890-5905. PubMed ID: 32989779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.