351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26873893)
1. Assessment and comparison of student engagement in a variety of physiology courses.
Hopper MK
Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Mar; 40(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 26873893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Engagement and higher order skill proficiency of students completing a medical physiology course in three diverse learning environments.
Hopper MK; Kaiser AN
Adv Physiol Educ; 2018 Sep; 42(3):429-438. PubMed ID: 29972057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of a small-group, active learning, tutorial-based, in-course enrichment program on student performance in medical physiology.
Powell JM; Murray IVJ; Johal J; Elks ML
Adv Physiol Educ; 2019 Sep; 43(3):339-344. PubMed ID: 31305148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An exploration of the factors that contribute to learning satisfaction of first-year anatomy and physiology students.
Eagleton S
Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Sep; 39(3):158-66. PubMed ID: 26330031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital chalk-talk videos improve knowledge and satisfaction in renal physiology.
Roberts JK; Chudgar SM; Engle D; McClain EK; Jakoi E; Berkoben M; Lehrich RW
Adv Physiol Educ; 2018 Mar; 42(1):146-151. PubMed ID: 29446313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new approach for laboratory exercise of pathophysiology in China based on student-centered learning.
Chen J; Zhou J; Sun L; Wu Q; Lu H; Tian J
Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Jun; 39(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 26031728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ClueConnect: a word array game to promote student comprehension of key terminology in an introductory anatomy and physiology course.
Burleson KM; Olimpo JT
Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Jun; 40(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 27105741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing student engagement and self-regulated learning in a medical gross anatomy course.
Pizzimenti MA; Axelson RD
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 24845421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Student engagement and higher order skill proficiency: a comparison of traditional didactic and renewed integrated active learning curricula.
Hopper MK; Brake DA
Adv Physiol Educ; 2018 Dec; 42(4):685-692. PubMed ID: 30431324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum.
FitzPatrick KA; Finn KE; Campisi J
Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Sep; 35(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 21908838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Promoting student engagement and academic achievement in first-year anatomy and physiology courses.
Reinke NB
Adv Physiol Educ; 2019 Dec; 43(4):443-450. PubMed ID: 31460774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alignment of learning objectives, assessments, and active learning to promote critical thinking in a first-year medical physiology course: lessons learned.
Anderson LC; Fernandez-Branson C
Adv Physiol Educ; 2024 Jun; 48(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 38511215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Collaborative-group testing improves learning and knowledge retention of human physiology topics in second-year medical students.
Vázquez-García M
Adv Physiol Educ; 2018 Jun; 42(2):232-239. PubMed ID: 29616577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flipped classrooms and student learning: not just surface gains.
McLean S; Attardi SM; Faden L; Goldszmidt M
Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Mar; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 26847257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interteaching within a human physiology course: a comparison of first- and second-year students' learning skills and perceptions.
Byrne B; Guy R
Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Sep; 40(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 27445284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are your students ready for anatomy and physiology? Developing tools to identify students at risk for failure.
Gultice A; Witham A; Kallmeyer R
Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Jun; 39(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 26031727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Student learning styles in anatomy and physiology courses: Meeting the needs of nursing students.
Johnston AN; Hamill J; Barton MJ; Baldwin S; Percival J; Williams-Pritchard G; Salvage-Jones J; Todorovic M
Nurse Educ Pract; 2015 Nov; 15(6):415-20. PubMed ID: 26027548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions.
Lombardi SA; Hicks RE; Thompson KV; Marbach-Ad G
Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24585474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Blending problem-based learning with Web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology.
Taradi SK; Taradi M; Radic K; Pokrajac N
Adv Physiol Educ; 2005 Mar; 29(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 15718381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Student performance in and perceptions of a high structure undergraduate human anatomy course.
Shaffer JF
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):516-528. PubMed ID: 26990231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
