BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26874157)

  • 1. Comparison of treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lin AE; Chang YC; Lin MY; Tam KW; Shen YD
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 51(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26874157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the success rate between monocanalicular and bicanalicular intubations in incomplete complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Eshraghi B; Jamshidian-Tehrani M; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
    Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):215-217. PubMed ID: 28627964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparing of Treatment Results of Monocanalicular and Bicanalicular Intubation in Inborn Lacrimal Duct Obstruction].
    Červenka S; Matoušek P; Komínek P
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2016; 72(5):178-181. PubMed ID: 28224803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Analysis of Silicone Tube Intubation Versus Probing and Balloon Dilation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Alruwaili R; Alanazi F; Alrashidi A; Hazazi M; Alenezi M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 35(4):1114-1119. PubMed ID: 38727216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Kaufman LM; Guay-Bhatia LA
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Feb; 105(2):336-41. PubMed ID: 9479296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Endoscopically Assisted Primary Probing and Bicanalicular Silicone Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Aged 4 to 7 Years.
    Arici C; Mergen B; Ozan T; Batu Oto B
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2023; 60(2):101-107. PubMed ID: 35446188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monocanalicular silastic intubation for the initial correction of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Engel JM; Hichie-Schmidt C; Khammar A; Ostfeld BM; Vyas A; Ticho BH
    J AAPOS; 2007 Apr; 11(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 17307001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Balloon dacryocystoplasty and monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Huang YH; Liao SL; Lin LL
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 247(6):795-9. PubMed ID: 19330345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of monocanalicular stenting and balloon dacryoplasty in secondary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed primary probing.
    Goldstein SM; Goldstein JB; Katowitz JA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Sep; 20(5):352-7. PubMed ID: 15377901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing for the treatment of simple and incomplete complex types of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 18 months old.
    Eshraghi B; Khalilipour E; Ameli K; Bazvand F; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
    Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 28627958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Andalib D; Gharabaghi D; Nabai R; Abbaszadeh M
    J AAPOS; 2010 Oct; 14(5):421-4. PubMed ID: 21035069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in external dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Saleh GM; Tossounis CM; Litwin AS; Gauba V; Samaras K; McLean CJ
    Orbit; 2009; 28(2-3):110-4. PubMed ID: 19839894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Farat JG; Schellini SA; Dib RE; Santos FGD; Meneghim RLFS; Jorge EC
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2021; 84(1):91-98. PubMed ID: 33470349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of balloon catheter dilatation and silicon intubation as the secondary treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed primary probing].
    Hu M; Wu Q; Fan YW; Cao WW; Lin Q; Yu G
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 52(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 26906708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children: A Retrospective Review.
    Eustis HS; Nguyen AH
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2018 Jan; 55(1):65-67. PubMed ID: 28991351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Congenital nasolacrymal duct obstruction: pulled monocanalicular intubation (Monoka) versus pushed monocanalicular intubation (Masterka)].
    Vernat-Tabarly O; Delmas J; Robert PY
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2020 Jun; 43(6):461-466. PubMed ID: 32360081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective, randomised comparison of probing versus bicanalicular silastic intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Al-Faky YH; Mousa A; Kalantan H; Al-Otaibi A; Alodan H; Alsuhaibani AH
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 99(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 25185252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stepwise treatment paradigm for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Casady DR; Meyer DR; Simon JW; Stasior GO; Zobal-Ratner JL
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006; 22(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 16855492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insights in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Avram E
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2017; 61(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 29450381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early loss of monocanalicular silicone tubes in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: incidence, predictors, and effect on outcome.
    Dotan G; Ohana O; Leibovitch I; Stolovitch C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Mar; 79(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 25595447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.