These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Biomechanical comparison of different anchors (foundations) for the pediatric dual growing rod technique. Mahar AT; Bagheri R; Oka R; Kostial P; Akbarnia BA Spine J; 2008; 8(6):933-9. PubMed ID: 18082463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proximal Fixation in Adolescent Scoliosis Lenke 1 and 3 Treated by Posteromedial Translation Using Sublaminar Bands: Transverse-pedicular Hook Claw Versus Transverse Hook-pedicular Screw Claw. Langlais T; Rougereau G; Bruncottan B; Bolzinger M; Accadbled F; Compagnon R; Sales de Gauzy J Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Dec; 34(10):377-382. PubMed ID: 33769973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar pedicle screws in spondylolytic vertebrae: comparison of fixation strength between the traditional trajectory and a cortical bone trajectory. Matsukawa K; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Hosogane N; Asazuma T; Chiba K J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):910-5. PubMed ID: 26895531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Biomechanical study and digital modeling of traction resistance in posterior thoracic implants]. Gayet LE; Hamcha H; Charbonneau A; Texereau J; Bertheau D; Bellicaud D; Pries P Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Sep; 87(5):459-68. PubMed ID: 11547233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cortical screws used to rescue failed lumbar pedicle screw construct: a biomechanical analysis. Calvert GC; Lawrence BD; Abtahi AM; Bachus KN; Brodke DS J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Feb; 22(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 25478820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation. van Laar W; Meester RJ; Smit TH; van Royen BJ Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1209-14. PubMed ID: 17203270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation: comparison of the transpedicular and extrapedicular techniques. White KK; Oka R; Mahar AT; Lowry A; Garfin SR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):E355-8. PubMed ID: 16721279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjustment of suboptimally placed lumbar pedicle screws decreases pullout strength and alters biomechanics of the construct: a pilot cadaveric study. Wadhwa RK; Thakur JD; Khan IS; James J; Ahmed O; Zhang S; Henderson B; Ogden A; Guthikonda B; Nanda A World Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 83(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 24793978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of four- versus six-screw constructs for short-segment pedicle screw and rod instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures. Norton RP; Milne EL; Kaimrajh DN; Eismont FJ; Latta LL; Williams SK Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1734-9. PubMed ID: 24462814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical study and digital modeling of traction resistance in posterior thoracic implants. Gayet LE; Pries P; Hamcha H; Clarac JP; Texereau J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(7):707-14. PubMed ID: 11923663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. Liljenqvist U; Hackenberg L; Link T; Halm H Acta Orthop Belg; 2001 Apr; 67(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 11383294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength among different sizes of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal screw size for optimal fixation? Matsukawa K; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Hosogane N; Abe Y; Asazuma T; Chiba K Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Mar; 158(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 26769471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]