BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26875110)

  • 1. Stabbing simulations and DNA transfer.
    Samie L; Hicks T; Castella V; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():73-80. PubMed ID: 26875110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of Bayesian Networks and simulation methods to identify the variables impacting the value of evidence assessed under activity level propositions in stabbing cases.
    Samie L; Champod C; Taylor D; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102334. PubMed ID: 32563838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shedding light on the relative DNA contribution of two persons handling the same object.
    Oldoni F; Castella V; Hall D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():148-157. PubMed ID: 27441463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
    Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trace DNA evidence dynamics: An investigation into the deposition and persistence of directly- and indirectly-transferred DNA on regularly-used knives.
    Meakin GE; Butcher EV; van Oorschot RAH; Morgan RM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():38-47. PubMed ID: 28363122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inclusion probability with dropout: an operational formula.
    Milot E; Courteau J; Crispino F; Mailly F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():71-76. PubMed ID: 25559642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
    Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A molecular exploration of human DNA/RNA co-extracted from the palmar surface of the hands and fingers.
    Lacerenza D; Aneli S; Omedei M; Gino S; Pasino S; Berchialla P; Robino C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():44-53. PubMed ID: 26844918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevalence of human cell material: DNA and RNA profiling of public and private objects and after activity scenarios.
    van den Berge M; Ozcanhan G; Zijlstra S; Lindenbergh A; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():81-9. PubMed ID: 26736139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data?
    Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():13-16. PubMed ID: 25474687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Familial searching on DNA mixtures with dropout.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():128-138. PubMed ID: 26905597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
    Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Source level interpretation of mixed biological stains using coding region SNPs.
    Dørum G; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Haas C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102685. PubMed ID: 35381476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Secondary and subsequent DNA transfer during criminal investigation.
    Fonneløp AE; Egeland T; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():155-162. PubMed ID: 26005954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.