219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26875110)
21. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Looking for the pinpoint: Optimizing identification, recovery and DNA extraction of micro traces in forensic casework.
Dierig L; Schmidt M; Wiegand P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102191. PubMed ID: 31756628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of different interpretation strategies for low template DNA mixtures.
Pfeifer CM; Klein-Unseld R; Klintschar M; Wiegand P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 22739132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The prevalence of mixed DNA profiles in fingernail samples taken from couples who co-habit using autosomal and Y-STRs.
Malsom S; Flanagan N; McAlister C; Dixon L
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Mar; 3(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 19215872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. DNA transfer when using gloves in burglary simulations.
Carrara L; Hicks T; Samie L; Taroni F; Castella V
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Mar; 63():102823. PubMed ID: 36563530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analysis of allelic drop-out using the Identifiler(®) and PowerPlex(®) 16 forensic STR typing systems.
Lohmueller KE; Rudin N; Inman K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():1-11. PubMed ID: 24841801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Human genotyposcopy: the identification of the species, sex and individual by DNA genetic imprints in a case connected with a murder attempt].
Rogaev EI; Syrokvasheva EIu; Pimenov MG; Stegnova TV
Sud Med Ekspert; 1992; 35(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 1589883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the performance of different models for the interpretation of low level mixed DNA profiles.
Bille TW; Weitz SM; Coble MD; Buckleton J; Bright JA
Electrophoresis; 2014 Nov; 35(21-22):3125-33. PubMed ID: 25168355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures.
Hicks T; Kerr Z; Pugh S; Bright JA; Curran J; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102481. PubMed ID: 33607394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An LR framework incorporating sensitivity analysis to model multiple direct and secondary transfer events on skin surface.
Gill P; Bleka Ø; Roseth A; Fonneløp AE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102509. PubMed ID: 33930816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The 'factor of two' issue in mixed DNA profiles.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
J Theor Biol; 2014 Dec; 363():300-6. PubMed ID: 25158162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A top-down approach to DNA mixtures.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102250. PubMed ID: 32169810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The prevalence of mixed DNA profiles in fingernail samples taken from individuals in the general population.
Cook O; Dixon L
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19083729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Combining evidence across multiple mixed DNA profiles for improved resolution of a donor when a common contributor can be assumed.
Taylor D; Kruijver M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102375. PubMed ID: 32937256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Least-square deconvolution: a framework for interpreting short tandem repeat mixtures.
Wang T; Xue N; Birdwell JD
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1284-97. PubMed ID: 17199614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
