281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26875190)
1. How different are composite and traditional TTO valuations of severe EQ-5D-5L states?
Xie F; Pullenayegum E; Gaebel K; Bansback N; Bryan S; Ohinmaa A; Poissant L; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2016 Aug; 25(8):2101-8. PubMed ID: 26875190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada.
Xie F; Pullenayegum E; Gaebel K; Bansback N; Bryan S; Ohinmaa A; Poissant L; Johnson JA;
Med Care; 2016 Jan; 54(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 26492214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How dead is dead? Qualitative findings from participants of combined traditional and lead-time time trade-off valuations.
Al Sayah F; Mladenovic A; Gaebel K; Xie F; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2016 Jan; 25(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26216584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Igarashi A; Fukuda T; Saito S; Shimozuma K
Value Health; 2016; 19(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 27565282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study.
Ludwig K; von der Schulenburg JG; Greiner W
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Feb; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 28219389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.
Law EH; Pickard AS; Xie F; Walton SM; Lee TA; Schwartz A
Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):968-982. PubMed ID: 30403577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off.
Jiang R; Shaw J; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS
Qual Life Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1433-1444. PubMed ID: 33247810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valuation of Health States Considered to Be Worse Than Death-An Analysis of Composite Time Trade-Off Data From 5 EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies.
Gandhi M; Rand K; Luo N
Value Health; 2019 Mar; 22(3):370-376. PubMed ID: 30832976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring non-iterative time trade-off methods for valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states.
Yang Z; Rand K; Stolk E; Busschbach J; Luo N
Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38104294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.
Sayah FA; Bansback N; Bryan S; Ohinmaa A; Poissant L; Pullenayegum E; Xie F; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1679-85. PubMed ID: 26659899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A shortcut to mean-based time tradeoff tariffs for the EQ-5D?
Rand-Hendriksen K; Augestad LA; Dahl FA; Kristiansen IS; Stavem K
Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):569-77. PubMed ID: 22247424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating Utility Values for Health States of DFU Patients Using EQ-5D-5L and cTTO.
Arab-Zozani M; Safari H; Dori Z; Afshari S; Ameri H; Namiranian N; Hoseini E; Jafari A
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2022 Mar; 21(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 33939495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experience-Based Swedish TTO and VAS Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L Health States.
Burström K; Teni FS; Gerdtham UG; Leidl R; Helgesson G; Rolfson O; Henriksson M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Aug; 38(8):839-856. PubMed ID: 32307663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Re-revisiting the Utilities of Health States Worse than Dead: The Problem Remains.
Jakubczyk M
Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):875-885. PubMed ID: 37846095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing 2 Alternative Time Trade-Off Methods for Valuation of Children's Health States.
Yang Z; Devlin NJ; Rand K; Luo N
Value Health; 2024 Jan; 27(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 37813195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using Time Trade-Off Values to Estimate EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: An Exploratory Study.
Yang Z; Jiang J; Wang P; Wu J; Fang Y; Feng D; Xi X; Luo N
Value Health; 2023 Jul; 26(7):968-973. PubMed ID: 36921897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.
Pickard AS; Law EH; Jiang R; Pullenayegum E; Shaw JW; Xie F; Oppe M; Boye KS; Chapman RH; Gong CL; Balch A; Busschbach JJV
Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):931-941. PubMed ID: 31426935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a Smaller Design for EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies.
Yang Z; Luo N; Oppe M; Bonsel G; Busschbach J; Stolk E
Value Health; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1295-1302. PubMed ID: 31708067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peruvian Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L: A Direct Comparison of Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
Augustovski F; Belizán M; Gibbons L; Reyes N; Stolk E; Craig BM; Tejada RA
Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):880-888. PubMed ID: 32762989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
