These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26875474)

  • 1. Is one measurement enough to evaluate blood pressure among adolescents? A blood pressure screening experience in more than 9000 children with a subset comparison of auscultatory to mercury measurements.
    Negroni-Balasquide X; Bell CS; Samuel J; Samuels JA
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2016 Feb; 10(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 26875474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
    Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
    Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
    Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
    Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressures.
    Park MK; Menard SW; Yuan C
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2001 Jan; 155(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 11177062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.
    Weaver MG; Park MK; Lee DH
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The San Antonio Biethnic Children's Blood Pressure Study: auscultatory findings.
    Menard SW; Park MK; Yuan CH
    J Pediatr Health Care; 1999; 13(5):237-44. PubMed ID: 10776199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
    Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
    Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
    Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
    J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement methods in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Duncombe SL; Voss C; Harris KC
    J Hypertens; 2017 Feb; 35(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 27870656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can auscultatory blood pressure normative values be used for evaluation of oscillometric blood pressure in children?
    Šuláková T; Šuláková A; Strnadel J; Pavlíček J; Obermannová B; Feber J
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2017 Apr; 19(4):381-387. PubMed ID: 28383188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of portable noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices: comparisons with intra-arterial and sphygmomanometer measurements.
    Graettinger WF; Lipson JL; Cheung DG; Weber MA
    Am Heart J; 1988 Oct; 116(4):1155-60. PubMed ID: 3177191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated blood pressure measurement devices: a potential source of morbidity in preeclampsia?
    Quinn M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 170(5 Pt 1):1303-7. PubMed ID: 8178857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oscillometric finger blood pressure versus brachial auscultative blood pressure recording.
    Iyriboz Y
    J Fam Pract; 1990 Oct; 31(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 2212968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparability of oscillometric to simultaneous auscultatory blood pressure measurement in children.
    Ringrose JS; Alabbas A; Jalali A; Khinda H; Morgan C; Yiu V; Alexander RT; Padwal R
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Apr; 24(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30856623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of overcuffing on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Ringrose J; Millay J; Babwick SA; Neil M; Langkaas LA; Padwal R
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2015 Jul; 9(7):563-8. PubMed ID: 26101170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.