These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies. Hogan JW; Lancaster T Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practice of causal inference with the propensity of being zero or one: assessing the effect of arbitrary cutoffs of propensity scores. Kang J; Chan W; Kim MO; Steiner PM Commun Stat Appl Methods; 2016 Jan; 23(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 31467864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal Treatment Effects from a Propensity Score Perspective. Zhou X; Xie Y J Polit Econ; 2019 Dec; 127(6):3070-3084. PubMed ID: 34121769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the use of propensity scores in principal causal effect estimation. Jo B; Stuart EA Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(23):2857-75. PubMed ID: 19610131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new weighted balance measure helped to select the variables to be included in a propensity score model. Caruana E; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M; Pirracchio R J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1415-22.e2. PubMed ID: 26050059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation. Genbäck M; de Luna X Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):506-515. PubMed ID: 30430543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of propensity score methods for causal inference with high-dimensional covariates. Gao Q; Zhang Y; Sun H; Wang T Brief Bioinform; 2022 Jul; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 35667004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Right Tool for the Job: Choosing Between Covariate-balancing and Generalized Boosted Model Propensity Scores. Setodji CM; McCaffrey DF; Burgette LF; Almirall D; Griffin BA Epidemiology; 2017 Nov; 28(6):802-811. PubMed ID: 28817469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Making valid causal inferences from observational data. Martin W Prev Vet Med; 2014 Feb; 113(3):281-97. PubMed ID: 24113257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CAUSAL INFERENCE AND HETEROGENEITY BIAS IN SOCIAL SCIENCE. Xie Y Inf Knowl Syst Manage; 2011 Jan; 10(1):279-289. PubMed ID: 23970824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-dimensional generalized propensity score with application to omics data. Gao Q; Zhang Y; Liang J; Sun H; Wang T Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34410351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On adaptive propensity score truncation in causal inference. Ju C; Schwab J; van der Laan MJ Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1741-1760. PubMed ID: 29991330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores. Pan W; Bai H BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jul; 15():53. PubMed ID: 26215035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score. Austin PC Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1202-17. PubMed ID: 18972454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Strengthening causal inference in studies using non-experimental data: an application of propensity score and instrumental variable methods]. Kim MH; Do YK J Prev Med Public Health; 2007 Nov; 40(6):495-504. PubMed ID: 18063905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Propensity score methods in real-world epidemiology: A practical guide for first-time users. Loke YK; Mattishent K Diabetes Obes Metab; 2020 Apr; 22 Suppl 3():13-20. PubMed ID: 32250525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the sensitivity of methods for estimating principal causal effects. Stuart EA; Jo B Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):657-74. PubMed ID: 21971481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]