These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26877736)

  • 1. Ex Vivo Comparison of Mtwo and RaCe Rotary File Systems in Root Canal Deviation: One File Only versus the Conventional Method.
    Aminsobhani M; Razmi H; Nozari S
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Jul; 12(7):469-77. PubMed ID: 26877736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Apical transportation and canal straightening with different continuously tapered rotary file systems in severely curved root canals: F6 SkyTaper and OneShape versus Mtwo.
    Bürklein S; Jäger PG; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2017 Oct; 50(10):983-990. PubMed ID: 27809348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 16507074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparison of Mtwo and RaCe Rotary Instruments in the Preparation of Curved Canals.
    Canga M; Malagnino I; Malagnino G; Malagnino V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Feb; 21(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 32381814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Börjes L; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 23998461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in curved root canals.
    Talati A; Moradi S; Forghani M; Monajemzadeh A
    Iran Endod J; 2013; 8(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 23717330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Root canal shaping by single-file systems and rotary instruments: a laboratory study.
    Bane K; Faye B; Sarr M; Niang SO; Ndiaye D; Machtou P
    Iran Endod J; 2015; 10(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 25834600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ex-vivo study on the shaping parameters of two nickel-titanium rotary systems compared with hand instruments.
    Ehsani M; Zahedpasha S; Moghadamnia AA; Mirjani J
    Iran Endod J; 2011; 6(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 24778687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
    Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
    Azar MR; Mokhtare M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of surface preparation and maintenance of canal curvature following instrumentation with hand 'K' file and three different Ni-Ti rotary systems: A radiographic and SEM study.
    Bhatti N; Sroa R; Sikri VK
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2010 Apr; 1(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 22114390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed Tomography Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Volumetric Changes in Root Canal Dentin of Curved Canals Using Mtwo, ProTaper and ProTaper Next Rotary System-An In-vitro Study.
    Shivashankar MB; Niranjan NT; Jayasheel A; Kenchanagoudra MG
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Nov; 10(11):ZC10-ZC14. PubMed ID: 28050495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals.
    Sharma G; Kakkar P; Vats A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC43-7. PubMed ID: 25954704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of working length control consistency between hand K-files and Mtwo NiTi rotary system.
    Krajczár K; Varga E; Marada G; Jeges S; Tóth V
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2016 Apr; 8(2):e136-40. PubMed ID: 27034752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.