These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26877978)

  • 1. Accuracy of Bolton analysis measured in laser scanned digital models compared with plaster models (gold standard) and cone-beam computer tomography images.
    Kim J; Lagravére MO
    Korean J Orthod; 2016 Jan; 46(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 26877978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kim J; Heo G; Lagravère MO
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23957664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the accuracy of laser-scanned models and 3-dimensional rendered cone-beam computed tomographic images compared to digital caliper measurements on plaster casts.
    Yousefi F; Shokri A; Zahedi F; Farhadian M
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Dec; 51(4):429-438. PubMed ID: 34988004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental measurements and Bolton index reliability and accuracy obtained from 2D digital, 3D segmented CBCT, and 3d intraoral laser scanner.
    San José V; Bellot-Arcís C; Tarazona B; Zamora N; O Lagravère M; Paredes-Gallardo V
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Dec; 9(12):e1466-e1473. PubMed ID: 29410764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional comparison of 2 digital models obtained from cone-beam computed tomographic scans of polyvinyl siloxane impressions and plaster models.
    Park JY; Kim D; Han SS; Yu HS; Cha JY
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2019 Dec; 49(4):257-263. PubMed ID: 31915610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital model as an alternative to plaster model in assessment of space analysis.
    Kumar AA; Phillip A; Kumar S; Rawat A; Priya S; Kumaran V
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2015 Aug; 7(Suppl 2):S465-9. PubMed ID: 26538899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
    Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
    Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reliability of a novel method for fusion of digital dental casts and Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans.
    Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Bronkhorst EM; Breuning KH; Schols JG; Bergé SJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59130. PubMed ID: 23527111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Upper and Lower Arches Using Digital Technology: Measurement of the Index of Bolton and Correspondence between Arch Shapesand Orthodontic Arches.
    Pasini M; Carli E; Giambastiani F; Giuca MR; Tripodi D
    Dent J (Basel); 2023 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 37623284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of accuracy and repeatability using CBCT and a dental scanner by means of 3D software.
    Kim SR; Kim CM; Jeong ID; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 28294206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis.
    Akyalcin S; Dyer DJ; English JD; Sar C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using laser and computed tomography plaster model scanners.
    Camardella LT; Ongkosuwito EM; Penning EW; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Vilella OV; Breuning KH
    Korean J Orthod; 2020 Jan; 50(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 32042716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear Measurements Made on CBCT-derived Digital Models.
    Maroua AL; Ajaj M; Hajeer MY
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 27340163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anterior teeth root inclination prediction derived from digital models: A comparative study of plaster study casts and CBCT images.
    Dastoori M; Bouserhal JP; Halazonetis DJ; Athanasiou AE
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Nov; 10(11):e1069-e1074. PubMed ID: 30607223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
    Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
    Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton ratios using Bibliocast Cécile3 digital models.
    Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Junior HM; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO
    Int Orthod; 2010 Sep; 8(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 20739241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.