These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

765 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26878090)

  • 21. Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention?
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):826-42. PubMed ID: 2148595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Constraints in task-set control: modality dominance patterns among effector systems.
    Huestegge L; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):633-7. PubMed ID: 23025562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of Input Modality on Vocal Effector Prioritization in Manual-Vocal Dual Tasks.
    Hoffmann MA; Westermann M; Pieczykolan A; Huestegge L
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 32520669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):934-53. PubMed ID: 23592183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Parallel response selection after callosotomy.
    Hazeltine E; Weinstein A; Ivry RB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 18004953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice.
    Hazeltine E; Teague D; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):527-45. PubMed ID: 12075886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cue the effects: Stimulus-action effect modality compatibility and dual-task costs.
    Schacherer J; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):350-368. PubMed ID: 32223289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Sturm W; Willmes K; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():67-76. PubMed ID: 25577489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage?
    Johnston JC; McCann RS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):694-719. PubMed ID: 16707358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect?
    Van Selst M; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Oct; 25(5):1268-83. PubMed ID: 10531663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1546-1562. PubMed ID: 35103924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Simon effect in vocal responses.
    Wühr P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):210-26. PubMed ID: 16321353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of sensory-motor modality compatibility in language processing.
    Schaeffner S; Koch I; Philipp AM
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):212-23. PubMed ID: 25813198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multisession, dual-task psychological refractory period practice benefits older and younger adults equally.
    Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Elicker JD; Lien MC
    Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):369-99. PubMed ID: 20183098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spatial correspondence between functional MRI (fMRI) activations and cortical current density maps of event-related potentials (ERP): a study with four tasks.
    Minati L; Rosazza C; Zucca I; D'Incerti L; Scaioli V; Bruzzone MG
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Dec; 21(2):112-27. PubMed ID: 18758934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.
    Bock O; Wechsler K; Koch I; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):568-576. PubMed ID: 31776662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.