679 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26878102)
1. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire.
Moreira TS; Magalhães Lde C; Silva RD; Martin RL; Resende MA
Disabil Rehabil; 2016 Dec; 38(25):2479-90. PubMed ID: 26878102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders.
Mazaheri M; Salavati M; Negahban H; Sohani SM; Taghizadeh F; Feizi A; Karimi A; Parnianpour M
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2010 Jun; 18(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 20338253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Foot and ankle ability measure: cross-cultural translation and validation of the Italian version of the ADL module (FAAM-I/ADL)].
Sartorio F; Vercelli S; Bravini E; Bargeri S; Moroso M; Plebani G; Ferriero G
Med Lav; 2014 Jul; 105(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 25134631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
Çelik D; Malkoç M; Martin R
Rheumatol Int; 2016 Oct; 36(10):1469-76. PubMed ID: 27136921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability.
Anaforoglu Kulunkoglu B; Celik D
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jan; 58(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 30448187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
Martin RL; Irrgang JJ; Burdett RG; Conti SF; Van Swearingen JM
Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Nov; 26(11):968-83. PubMed ID: 16309613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and Reliability of Thai Version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Subjective Form.
Arunakul M; Arunakul P; Suesiritumrong C; Angthong C; Chernchujit B
J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 Jun; 98(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 26219160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Spanish version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM-Sp).
Cervera-Garvi P; Ortega-Avila AB; Morales-Asencio JM; Cervera-Marin JA; Martin RR; Gijon-Nogueron G
J Foot Ankle Res; 2017; 10():39. PubMed ID: 28852426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS).
Turhan E; Demirel M; Daylak A; Huri G; Doral MN; Çelik D
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Jan; 51(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 27956082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure.
Uematsu D; Suzuki H; Sasaki S; Nagano Y; Shinozuka N; Sunagawa N; Fukubayashi T
J Athl Train; 2015 Jan; 50(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 25310247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle.
Angthong C
Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(4):224-228. PubMed ID: 27810018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of Turkish Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale.
Analay Akbaba Y; Celik D; Ogut RT
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(6):1139-1142. PubMed ID: 27614824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure.
Weel H; Zwiers R; Azim D; Sierevelt IN; Haverkamp D; van Dijk CN; Kerkhoffs GM
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Apr; 24(4):1348-54. PubMed ID: 25536950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM.
Borloz S; Crevoisier X; Deriaz O; Ballabeni P; Martin RL; Luthi F
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Feb; 12():40. PubMed ID: 21303520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Arabic version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-Arabic).
Alotaibi NM; Aljadi SH; Alrowayeh HN
Disabil Rehabil; 2016 Dec; 38(25):2469-78. PubMed ID: 26856367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rasch Analysis of Reliability and Validity of Scores From the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
Matheny LM; Clanton TO
Foot Ankle Int; 2020 Feb; 41(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 31665926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation.
González-Sánchez M; Li GZ; Ruiz Muñoz M; Cuesta-Vargas AI
Disabil Rehabil; 2017 Oct; 39(21):2182-2189. PubMed ID: 27597231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese version of the identification of functional ankle instability questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders.
Wang W; Sheng J; Tang Y; Xie Q; Wei M; Li Z; Zheng W
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 May; 21(1):325. PubMed ID: 32450830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).
Lee KM; Chung CY; Kwon SS; Sung KH; Lee SY; Won SH; Lee DJ; Lee SC; Park MS
Clin Rheumatol; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1443-50. PubMed ID: 23703359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability questionnaire in Persian speaking participants with a history of ankle sprain.
Mohamadi S; Dadgoo M; Ebrahimi I; Salavati M; Saeedi A; Valiollahi B
Disabil Rehabil; 2019 Aug; 41(16):1931-1936. PubMed ID: 29986616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
