274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26879737)
1. Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: the Effect of Truncated Testimony on Juror Decision-making.
Anderson L; Gross J; Sonne T; Zajac R; Hayne H
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):200-17. PubMed ID: 26879737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Jurors' reactions to satanic ritual abuse allegations.
Bottoms BL; Diviak KR; Davis SL
Child Abuse Negl; 1997 Sep; 21(9):845-59. PubMed ID: 9298262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations.
Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jul; 38(13-14):7964-7989. PubMed ID: 36762531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Jurors' Gender and Their Fear of False Child Sexual Abuse Accusations Are Related to Their Belief in Child Victims' Allegations.
Jones TM; Bottoms BL; Sachdev K; Aniciete J; Gorak K
J Child Sex Abus; 2021 Oct; 30(7):828-846. PubMed ID: 34129807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attorney Questions Predict Jury-eligible Adult Assessments of Attorneys, Child Witnesses, and Defendant Guilt.
Mugno AP; Klemfuss JZ; Lyon TD
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 26932420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making.
Cooper A; Quas JA; Cleveland KC
Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):813-28. PubMed ID: 25537438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors that Influence Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Credibility.
Call AA; Wingrove T
J Child Sex Abus; 2022; 31(6):726-742. PubMed ID: 35833559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expert testimony influences juror decisions in criminal trials involving recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.
Khurshid A; Jacquin KM
J Child Sex Abus; 2013; 22(8):949-67. PubMed ID: 24283545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the Credibility of Child Sexual Assault Victims in Court: The Impact of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner.
Golding JM; Wasarhaley NE; Lynch KR; Lippert A; Magyarics CL
Behav Sci Law; 2015 Aug; 33(4):493-507. PubMed ID: 26294384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Investigating the Role of Delayed Disclosure and Relationship to the Perpetrator.
Miller QC; Call AA; London K
J Interpers Violence; 2022 Dec; 37(23-24):NP23374-NP23396. PubMed ID: 35285346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors' perceptions of child sexual assault.
Wiley TR; Bottoms BL
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 18404363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Evidence Type and Judicial Warning on Juror Perceptions of Global and Specific Witness Evidence.
Wheatcroft JM; Keogan H
J Psychol; 2017 Apr; 151(3):247-267. PubMed ID: 27982750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations.
Haegerich TM; Bottoms BL
Law Hum Behav; 2000 Aug; 24(4):421-48. PubMed ID: 10974801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
