These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26879737)

  • 21. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making.
    Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.
    Anderson A; Wingrove T; Fox P; McLean K; Styer E
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 May; 33(9):1449-1471. PubMed ID: 26621035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Expert testimony regarding child witnesses: does it sensitize jurors to forensic interview quality?
    Buck JA; London K; Wright DB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 20443056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Explaining gender differences in jurors' reactions to child sexual assault cases.
    Bottoms BL; Peter-Hagene LC; Stevenson MC; Wiley TR; Mitchell TS; Goodman GS
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):789-812. PubMed ID: 25430669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Juror Decision-making in Death Penalty Sentencing when Presented with Defendant's History of Child Abuse or Neglect.
    Bell Holleran LL; Vaughan TJ; Vandiver DM
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Nov; 34(6):742-766. PubMed ID: 28098410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Statements from Youth in Legal Contexts: Effects of Consistency, Legal Role, and Age.
    Molinaro PF; Malloy LC
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):139-59. PubMed ID: 27021412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
    Carlson KA; Russo JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
    Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of acknowledging mock jurors' feelings on affective and cognitive biases: it depends on the sample.
    McCabe JG; Krauss DA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):331-57. PubMed ID: 21766326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of race on jurors' perceptions of lethal police use of force.
    Ewanation L; Maeder EM
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 36931849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Elder sexual abuse and implicit agism: examining the warm-incompetent bias among mock jurors.
    Syme ML; Cohn TJ
    J Elder Abuse Negl; 2020; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 31760911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of expert witness testimony and complainant cognitive statements on mock jurors' perceptions of rape trial testimony.
    Ryan N; Westera N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):693-705. PubMed ID: 31984046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Race, witness credibility, and jury deliberation in a simulated drug trafficking trial.
    Shaw EV; Lynch M; Laguna S; Frenda SJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):215-228. PubMed ID: 34351204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When does quality count?: Perceptions of hearsay testimony about child sexual abuse interviews.
    Buck JA; Warrren AR; Brigham JC
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):599-621. PubMed ID: 15732649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When will a child be believed? The impact of the victim's age and juror's gender on children's credibility and verdict in a sexual-abuse case.
    McCauley MR; Parker JF
    Child Abuse Negl; 2001 Apr; 25(4):523-39. PubMed ID: 11370724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When a Battered Victim Kills Their Abuser: The Impact of Child and Expert Testimony on Mock Jurors' Decision-Making.
    Chae H; McWilliams K
    J Interpers Violence; 2024 Oct; ():8862605241284662. PubMed ID: 39376061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
    Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The credibility of recovered memory testimony: exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender.
    Bornstein BH; Muller SL
    Child Abuse Negl; 2001 Nov; 25(11):1415-26. PubMed ID: 11766008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis.
    Kovera MB; Gresham AW; Borgida E; Gray E; Regan PC
    J Appl Psychol; 1997 Feb; 82(1):178-91. PubMed ID: 9119796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.