155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26881416)
1. Comparative adoption of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography machines across Australia.
Zhang A; Critchley S; Monsour PA
Aust Dent J; 2016 Dec; 61(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 26881416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current trends in the adoption and education of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography machines across Australia.
Lam M; Critchley S; Zhang A; Monsour P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200380. PubMed ID: 33449832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The growth of Medicare rebatable cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in Australia.
Brown LF; Monsour P
Aust Dent J; 2015 Dec; 60(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 25366248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dentists' use of digital radiographic techniques: Part II - extraoral radiography: a questionnaire study of Swedish dentists.
Svenson B; Ståhlnacke K; Karlsson R; Fält A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Mar; 77(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 30422025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects from changes to the Medicare Benefits Schedule in 2014 on cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography scans across Australia.
Zhang A; Brown LF; Monsour PA
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Oct; 61(5):600-606. PubMed ID: 28345214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How do dentists use CBCT in dental clinics? A Norwegian nationwide survey.
Hol C; Hellén-Halme K; Torgersen G; Nilsson M; Møystad A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Apr; 73(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 25415368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Clinical Decision Making among Specialists.
Rodríguez G; Abella F; Durán-Sindreu F; Patel S; Roig M
J Endod; 2017 Feb; 43(2):194-199. PubMed ID: 28132707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of experimental phantoms to determine the accuracy and reliability of mandibular cortical width measurements by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
Hayashi Y; Ito M; Imanishi Y; Watanabe K; Matsumoto K; Arai Y; Honda K
J Oral Sci; 2020 Jun; 62(3):303-307. PubMed ID: 32522912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Panoramic Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for the Detection of Tonsilloliths.
Ozdede M; Akay G; Karadag O; Peker I
Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 31842016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of temporal bone pneumatization: a study in vivo using cone-beam-computed tomography.
de Rezende Barbosa GL; Nascimento Mdo C; Ladeira DB; Bomtorim VV; da Cruz AD; Almeida SM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 23850158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the use of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the assessment of pre-eruptive intracoronal resorption.
Demirtas O; Dane A; Yildirim E
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016 Nov; 74(8):636-641. PubMed ID: 27669814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in apical periodontitis diagnosis.
López FU; Kopper PM; Cucco C; Della Bona A; de Figueiredo JA; Vier-Pelisser FV
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2057-60. PubMed ID: 25306306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neurosensoric disturbances after surgical removal of the mandibular third molar based on either panoramic imaging or cone beam CT scanning: A randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Petersen LB; Vaeth M; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(2):20150224. PubMed ID: 26648386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of digitalized panorama and cone beam computed tomographic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implant surgery.
Yim JH; Ryu DM; Lee BS; Kwon YD
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):669-73. PubMed ID: 21415634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The usage of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography among Turkish dentists.
Dölekoğlu S; Fişekçioğlu E; İlgüy M; İlgüy D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 21831978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographic findings of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: Comparison with cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography.
Demir A; Pekiner FN
Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Mar; 20(3):346-354. PubMed ID: 28256491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Survey of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Use among Endodontic Practitioners in the United States.
Setzer FC; Hinckley N; Kohli MR; Karabucak B
J Endod; 2017 May; 43(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 28292601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of cone beam computed tomography in comparison to conventional imaging techniques for the detection of bone invasion in oral cancer.
Linz C; Müller-Richter UD; Buck AK; Mottok A; Ritter C; Schneider P; Metzen D; Heuschmann P; Malzahn U; Kübler AC; Herrmann K; Bluemel C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 44(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25442744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography to Detect Periapical Lesions That Were Not Detected by Periapical Radiography: A Retrospective Assessment According to Tooth Group.
Uraba S; Ebihara A; Komatsu K; Ohbayashi N; Okiji T
J Endod; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1186-90. PubMed ID: 27372162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Periapical Radiography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Identifying Root Canal Configuration of Human Premolars.
Sousa TO; Haiter-Neto F; Nascimento EHL; Peroni LV; Freitas DQ; Hassan B
J Endod; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1176-1179. PubMed ID: 28527842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
