622 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26881902)
1. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
Smith AP; Zentall TR
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.
Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do pigeons prefer alternatives that include near-hit outcomes?
Stagner JP; Case JP; Sticklen MF; Duncan AK; Zentall TR
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 26167775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rats' preferences in the suboptimal choice procedure: Evaluating the impact of reinforcement probability and conditioned inhibitors.
Alba R; Rodríguez W; Martínez M; Orduña V
Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():574-582. PubMed ID: 29689334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.
Smith AP; Bailey AR; Chow JJ; Beckmann JS; Zentall TR
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159336. PubMed ID: 27441394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Does the predictive value of the conditioned reinforcer alone determine choice?
Case JP; Zentall TR
Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():320-326. PubMed ID: 30077654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rats are optimal in a choice task in which pigeons are not.
Trujano RE; Orduña V
Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():22-7. PubMed ID: 26200394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The essential value of the alternatives of the suboptimal choice procedure is different for pigeons and rats.
López-Tolsa GE; Niño JM; Orduña V
Behav Processes; 2020 Dec; 181():104245. PubMed ID: 32991942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Procrastination in the pigeon: Can conditioned reinforcement increase the likelihood of human procrastination?
Zentall TR; Case JP; Andrews DM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1952-1957. PubMed ID: 29188447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal behavior by rats in a choice task is associated to a persistent conditioned inhibition effect.
Trujano RE; López P; Rojas-Leguizamón M; Orduña V
Behav Processes; 2016 Sep; 130():65-70. PubMed ID: 27421608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
Beeby E; Alsop B
J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast between what is expected and what occurs increases pigeon's suboptimal choice.
Zentall TR; Andrews DM; Case JP
Anim Cogn; 2019 Jan; 22(1):81-87. PubMed ID: 30430348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Signaled reinforcement: Effects of signal reliability on choice between signaled and unsignaled alternatives.
Gomes-Ng S; Macababbad AC; Bai JYH; Baharrizki D; Elliffe D; Cowie S
Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104088. PubMed ID: 32092454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suboptimal choice by pigeons is eliminated when key-pecking behavior is replaced by treadle-pressing.
González-Torres R; Flores J; Orduña V
Behav Processes; 2020 Sep; 178():104157. PubMed ID: 32497555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.
McDevitt MA; Williams BA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Mar; 93(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 20885807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of contingency discriminability in suboptimal choice.
López-Tolsa GE; Orduña V
Behav Processes; 2021 Dec; 193():104511. PubMed ID: 34562512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
Mazur JE
J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Suboptimal choice by pigeons may result from the diminishing effect of nonreinforcement.
Laude JR; Stagner JP; Zentall TR
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 24893105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.
Mazur JE; Romano A
J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Nov; 58(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 1447543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Context effects on choice.
Goldshmidt JN; Lattal KM; Fantino E
J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Nov; 70(3):301-20. PubMed ID: 9821681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
