These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26881981)

  • 1. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients' Perspective.
    Cox RM; Johnson JA; Xu J
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e224-37. PubMed ID: 26881981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort.
    Johnson JA; Xu J; Cox RM
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):529-40. PubMed ID: 27556363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life III: Localization.
    Johnson JA; Xu J; Cox RM
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):746-759. PubMed ID: 28700447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; DeVries S; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):805-822. PubMed ID: 30379683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of advanced hearing aid technology on speech understanding for older listeners with mild to moderate, adult-onset, sensorineural hearing loss.
    Cox RM; Johnson JA; Xu J
    Gerontology; 2014; 60(6):557-68. PubMed ID: 25139516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of hearing aid technology level at first-fit on self-reported outcomes in patients with presbycusis: a randomized controlled trial.
    Houmøller SS; Wolff A; Tsai LT; Narayanan SK; Hougaard DD; Gaihede ML; Neher T; Godballe C; Schmidt JH
    Front Aging; 2023; 4():1158272. PubMed ID: 37342862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Personal Sound Amplification Product vs a Basic Hearing Aid and a Premium Hearing Aid.
    Cho YS; Park SY; Seol HY; Lim JH; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Jun; 145(6):516-522. PubMed ID: 31095263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using a Digital Language Processor to Quantify the Auditory Environment and the Effect of Hearing Aids for Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Klein KE; Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Apr; 29(4):279-291. PubMed ID: 29664722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Hearing Aid Technology Level and Individual Characteristics on Listener Outcome Measures.
    Plyler PN; Hausladen J; Capps M; Cox MA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3317-3329. PubMed ID: 34256006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.
    Cox RM; Schwartz KS; Noe CM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 20890203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Hearing Aid Technology Level on New Hearing Aid Users.
    Hausladen J; Plyler PN; Clausen B; Fincher A; Norris S; Russell T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Mar; 33(3):149-157. PubMed ID: 34670289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective and perceptual comparisons of two bluetooth hearing aid assistive devices.
    Clark JL; Pustejovsky C; Vanneste S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Aug; 12(6):614-617. PubMed ID: 27377435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefit on daily listening with technological advancements: comparison of basic and premium category hearing aids.
    Prakash P; Sreedhar A; Balan JR; Varghese AM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 279(6):3179-3187. PubMed ID: 35038028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Premium versus entry-level hearing aids: using group concept mapping to investigate the drivers of preference.
    Saleh HK; Folkeard P; Van Eeckhoutte M; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Dec; 61(12):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 34883040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.
    Kates JM; Arehart KH; Anderson MC; Kumar Muralimanohar R; Harvey LO
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1165-1175. PubMed ID: 29554034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of hearing aids on attention, memory, and auditory evoked potentials: A pragmatic, single-blinded, and randomised pilot clinical trial.
    Fernandes DE; Mastroianni Kirsztajn G; de Almeida K
    Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Apr; 75(4):e13953. PubMed ID: 33345388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of an affordable hearing aid with elderly persons.
    McPherson B; Wong ET
    Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 27(11):601-9. PubMed ID: 16019870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing aid use in everyday life: managing contextual variability.
    Williger B; Lang FR
    Gerontology; 2015; 61(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 25401727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of a programable body-worn digital hearing aid for older adults in a developing country: a randomized controlled trial with a cross-over design.
    Kasemsiri P; Yimtae K; Thanawirattananit P; Israsena P; Noymai A; Laohasiriwong S; Vatanasapt P; Siripaopradith P; Kingkaew P
    BMC Geriatr; 2021 Jul; 21(1):437. PubMed ID: 34301203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.