183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26882106)
1. Performance of Spot Photoscreener in Detecting Amblyopia Risk Factors in Chinese Pre-school and School Age Children Attending an Eye Clinic.
Mu Y; Bi H; Ekure E; Ding G; Wei N; Hua N; Qian X; Li X
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149561. PubMed ID: 26882106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Compared performance of Spot and SW800 photoscreeners on Chinese children.
Qian X; Li Y; Ding G; Li J; Lv H; Hua N; Wei N; He L; Wei L; Li X; Wang J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 103(4):517-522. PubMed ID: 29986946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of the Plusoptix A09 photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in Chinese children attending an eye clinic.
Yan XR; Jiao WZ; Li ZW; Xu WW; Li FJ; Wang LH
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0126052. PubMed ID: 26030210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The performance of visual photoscreening for Chinese preschool children aged 4 to 5 years].
Li R; Huang D; Zhu H; Sun QG; Wang Y; Zhang XH; Zhao XY; He J; Liu L; Zhou JJ; Liu H
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 56(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 32187947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of Photoscreener in Detection of Refractive Error in All Age Groups and Amblyopia Risk Factors in Children in a Tribal District of Odisha: The Tribal Odisha Eye Disease Study (TOES) # 3.
Panda L; Barik U; Nayak S; Barik B; Behera G; Kekunnaya R; Das T
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2018 May; 7(3):12. PubMed ID: 29881649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Instrument referral criteria for PlusoptiX and SureSight based on 2021 AAPOS guidelines: A population-based study.
Yan Q; Li R; Qian Y; Lin X; Zhu H; Wang Y; Zhao X; Zhang X; Sun Q; Hao Q; Tong H; Zhu Y; Li Z; Zhu Y; Liu H; Huang D
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():959757. PubMed ID: 36225773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of Amblyogenic Refractive Error Using the Spot Vision Screener in Children.
Gaiser H; Moore B; Srinivasan G; Solaka N; He R
Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):324-331. PubMed ID: 32413003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of noncycloplegic photorefraction using Spot photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in preschool children in an Indian eye clinic.
Sharma M; Ganesh S; Tibrewal S; Sabharwal S; Sachdeva N; Adil M; Chaudhary J; Siddiqui Z
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 68(3):504-509. PubMed ID: 32057013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of significant vision conditions in children using QuickSee wavefront autorefractor.
Bui A; Mitchell GL; McDaniel C; Morrison A; Toole A; Buckland M; Kulp MT
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 May; 44(3):501-513. PubMed ID: 38504505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of the 2WIN Photoscreener With "CR" Strabismus Estimation in High-Risk Patients.
Arnold SL; Arnold AW; Sprano JH; Arnold RW
Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 207():195-203. PubMed ID: 31077668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence of refractive error in Singaporean Chinese children: the strabismus, amblyopia, and refractive error in young Singaporean Children (STARS) study.
Dirani M; Chan YH; Gazzard G; Hornbeak DM; Leo SW; Selvaraj P; Zhou B; Young TL; Mitchell P; Varma R; Wong TY; Saw SM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Mar; 51(3):1348-55. PubMed ID: 19933197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of cycloplegic and noncycloplegic performance of spot vision screener in detection of amblyopia risk factors using 2021 AAPOS guidelines.
Bulut E; Dayi O; Celik Y; Bulut H; Başar E
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2024 Apr; 46():104073. PubMed ID: 38570151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of the Spot vision screener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children.
Silbert DI; Matta NS
J AAPOS; 2014 Apr; 18(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 24698615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for refractive errors in children: the plusoptiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy.
Paff T; Oudesluys-Murphy AM; Wolterbeek R; Swart-van den Berg M; de Nie JM; Tijssen E; Schalij-Delfos NE
J AAPOS; 2010 Dec; 14(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 21168070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photoscreener results with and without cycloplegia and their reliability according to biometric parameters.
Guler Alis M; Alis A
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2022 Jan; 45(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 34924211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Performance of Spot Photoscreener in 6 to 10 Weeks Infants in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Li Y; Li J; Wang H; Du M; Wei L; Su T; Ding G; Qian X; Hua N
J Ophthalmol; 2024; 2024():8817530. PubMed ID: 38765182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spot Refractive Screening With or Without Maximum Atropine Cycloplegia in Preschool Chinese Children.
Liu X; Feng J; Wang L; Tong H; Chen W
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2021; 58(3):146-153. PubMed ID: 34039157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of the Spot Vision Screener in detecting vision disorders in children 6 months to 36 months of age.
Srinivasan G; Russo D; Taylor C; Guarino A; Tattersall P; Moore B
J AAPOS; 2019 Oct; 23(5):278.e1-278.e6. PubMed ID: 31521849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of photoscreening technology in the general pediatrics office: a prospective study.
Bregman J; Donahue SP
J AAPOS; 2016 Apr; 20(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 27079598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AAPOS uniform guidelines for instrument-based pediatric vision screen validation 2021.
Arnold RW; Donahue SP; Silbert DI; Longmuir SQ; Bradford GE; Peterseim MMW; Hutchinson AK; O'Neil JW; de Alba Campomanes AG; Pineles SL;
J AAPOS; 2022 Feb; 26(1):1.e1-1.e6. PubMed ID: 35066152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
