BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26882145)

  • 1. A new PK equivalence test for a bridging study.
    Novick SJ; Zhang X; Yang H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(5):992-1002. PubMed ID: 26882145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the concentration curves directly in a pharmacokinetics, bioavailability/bioequivalence study.
    Liao JJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 15558699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulation study of the relationship between variation in bioavailability and clinical equivalence using a direct link model.
    Matsumoto Y; Shimizu M; Ogata H
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Jan; 43(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 15704616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inference of bioequivalence for log-normal distributed data with unspecified variances.
    Xu S; Hua SY; Menton R; Barker K; Menon S; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(17):2924-38. PubMed ID: 24403216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pharmacokinetic comparisons between two formulations containing 100 mg of miglitol in healthy male Korean volunteers: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover bioequivalence study.
    Choi HG; Jeon JY; Im YJ; Kim Y; Jang H; Kang S; Kim KH; Chae SW; Lee SY; Kim MG
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2014 Jan; 52(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24290415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the placebo effect modulate drug bioavailability? Randomized cross-over studies of three drugs.
    Hammami MM; Yusuf A; Shire FS; Hussein R; Al-Swayeh R
    J Negat Results Biomed; 2017 May; 16(1):10. PubMed ID: 28535819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate after oral administration of two modified-release formulations in healthy adults.
    Markowitz JS; Straughn AB; Patrick KS; DeVane CL; Pestreich L; Lee J; Wang Y; Muniz R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2003; 42(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 12648029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative pharmacokinetics study of two different clindamycin capsule formulations: a randomized, two-period, two-sequence, two-way crossover clinical trial in healthy volunteers.
    Sanki UK; Mandal BK; Chandrakala V
    Arzneimittelforschung; 2011; 61(9):538-43. PubMed ID: 22029232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of bioequivalence of a new fixed-dose combination of acarbose and metformin with the corresponding loose combination as well as the drug-drug interaction potential between both drugs in healthy adult male subjects.
    Kim S; Jang IJ; Shin D; Shin DS; Yoon S; Lim KS; Yu KS; Li J; Zhang H; Liu Y; Brendel E; Blode H; Wang Y
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2014 Aug; 39(4):424-31. PubMed ID: 24806030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Considerations for metabolite pharmacokinetic data in bioavailability/bioequivalence assessments. Overview of the recent trends.
    Srinivas NR
    Arzneimittelforschung; 2009; 59(4):155-65. PubMed ID: 19517891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of Bayesian methods for multivariate bioequivalence measures.
    Molina de Souza R; Achcar JA; Martinez EZ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(1):42-66. PubMed ID: 19127466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissolution modeling of bead formulations and predictions of bioequivalence for a highly soluble, highly permeable drug.
    Sperry DC; Thomas SJ; Lobo E
    Mol Pharm; 2010 Oct; 7(5):1450-7. PubMed ID: 20704266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metrics for the evaluation of bioequivalence of modified-release formulations.
    Endrenyi L; Tothfalusi L
    AAPS J; 2012 Dec; 14(4):813-9. PubMed ID: 22910857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generic lamotrigine versus brand-name Lamictal bioequivalence in patients with epilepsy: A field test of the FDA bioequivalence standard.
    Ting TY; Jiang W; Lionberger R; Wong J; Jones JW; Kane MA; Krumholz A; Temple R; Polli JE
    Epilepsia; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1415-24. PubMed ID: 26201987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of direct curve comparison metrics applied to pharmacokinetic profiles and relative bioavailability and bioequivalence.
    Marston SA; Polli JE
    Pharm Res; 1997 Oct; 14(10):1363-9. PubMed ID: 9358548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of two cetirizine hydrochloride formulations in healthy Chinese male volunteers.
    Xu FG; Liu Y; Zhang ZJ; Tian Y; Chen Y
    Arzneimittelforschung; 2009; 59(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 19856790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential pharmacokinetics of diclofenac potassium for oral solution vs immediate-release tablets from a randomized trial: effect of fed and fasting conditions.
    Chen C; Bujanover S; Kareht S; Rapoport AM
    Headache; 2015 Feb; 55(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 25546369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity of different pegylated liposomal doxorubicin formulations in preclinical models: is a conventional bioequivalence approach sufficient to ensure therapeutic equivalence of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin products?
    Mamidi RN; Weng S; Stellar S; Wang C; Yu N; Huang T; Tonelli AP; Kelley MF; Angiuoli A; Fung MC
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 66(6):1173-84. PubMed ID: 20661737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of aniracetam after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese male volunteers.
    Tian Y; Zhang JJ; Feng SD; Zhang ZJ; Chen Y
    Arzneimittelforschung; 2008; 58(10):497-500. PubMed ID: 19025058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian approach to average bioequivalence using Bayes' factor.
    Ghosh P; Khattree R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):719-34. PubMed ID: 14584718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.