These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26882636)
21. Researchers may be part of the problem in predatory publishing. Vogel L CMAJ; 2017 Oct; 189(42):E1324-E1325. PubMed ID: 29061862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Predatory Journals: A Potential Threat to Nursing Practice and Science. Bourgault AM Crit Care Nurse; 2019 Aug; 39(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 31371362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Knowledge on feet of clay]. Dahlqvist R Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1405-6. PubMed ID: 18574980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Conquering plagiarism in nursing research and authorship. Smith LS Nursing; 2016 Dec; 46(12):19-21. PubMed ID: 27875395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [The journals must honestly tell who is doing the job]. Bergström R Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1406-7. PubMed ID: 18574981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Ethics in scientific publishing: a 21st century primer. Dixon SD J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2014 Jun; 35(5):347-8. PubMed ID: 24906037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Be a responsible co-author. Kearney MH Res Nurs Health; 2014 Feb; 37(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24414937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Editors and publishing: integrity, trust and faith. Freshwater D J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2006 Feb; 13(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16441386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Editorial research and the publication process in biomedicine and health: Report from the Esteve Foundation Discussion Group, December 2012. Marušić A; Malički M; von Elm E Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 24969914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predatory publishing: Take care that you are not caught in the Open Access net. Stone TE; Rossiter RC Nurs Health Sci; 2015 Sep; 17(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 26224548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Best practice guidelines on publishing ethics: a publisher's perspective, 2nd edition. Graf C; Deakin L; Docking M; Jones J; Joshua S; McKerahan T; Ottmar M; Stevens A; Wates E; Wyatt D Int J Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 68(12):1410-28. PubMed ID: 25329600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications. Jacobs A; Wager E Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 15802003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen. Michell B Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Editing Process-From the Personal to the Professional. Katz A Oncol Nurs Forum; 2019 Jul; 46(4):395-396. PubMed ID: 31225834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]