These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26883316)

  • 21. The PROCESS of CARE.
    Richards D
    Evid Based Dent; 2017 Jun; 18(2):34. PubMed ID: 28642556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative: Its Role in Improving Cochrane Reviews.
    Williamson P; Clarke M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Apr; 2012(5):ED000041. PubMed ID: 22592744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Comparative Effectiveness of Innovative Treatments for Cancer (CEIT-Cancer) project: Rationale and design of the database and the collection of evidence available at approval of novel drugs.
    Ladanie A; Speich B; Naudet F; Agarwal A; Pereira TV; Sclafani F; Martin-Liberal J; Schmid T; Ewald H; Ioannidis JPA; Bucher HC; Kasenda B; Hemkens LG
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):505. PubMed ID: 30231912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.
    Benchimol EI; Smeeth L; Guttmann A; Harron K; Moher D; Petersen I; Sørensen HT; von Elm E; Langan SM;
    PLoS Med; 2015 Oct; 12(10):e1001885. PubMed ID: 26440803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Data quality assessment for comparative effectiveness research in distributed data networks.
    Brown JS; Kahn M; Toh S
    Med Care; 2013 Aug; 51(8 Suppl 3):S22-9. PubMed ID: 23793049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methodologic Guidance and Expectations for the Development and Reporting of Prediction Models and Causal Inference Studies.
    Harhay MO; Au DH; Dell SD; Gould MK; Redline S; Ryerson CJ; Cooke CR
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2020 Jun; 17(6):679-682. PubMed ID: 32275840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Infrastructure requirements for secondary data sources in comparative effectiveness research.
    Alemayehu D; Mardekian J
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S16-21. PubMed ID: 22074670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. No publication without confirmation.
    Mogil JS; Macleod MR
    Nature; 2017 Feb; 542(7642):409-411. PubMed ID: 28230138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical trial registry reporting: a transparent solution needed.
    The Lancet Oncology
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):741. PubMed ID: 31162086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. SRQR and COREQ Reporting Guidelines for Qualitative Studies.
    Dossett LA; Kaji AH; Cochran A
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Sep; 156(9):875-876. PubMed ID: 33825809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Guidance on Statistical Reporting to Help Improve Your Chances of a Favorable Statistical Review.
    Harhay MO; Donaldson GC
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2020 May; 201(9):1035-1038. PubMed ID: 32181675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Editorial Decision Making for Academic Medicine, 2021.
    Roberts LW; Coverdale J
    Acad Med; 2021 Jan; 96(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 33394645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Enabling comparative effectiveness research with informatics: show me the data!
    Safdar NM; Siegel E; Erickson BJ; Nagy P
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):1072-6. PubMed ID: 21680206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New Evidence on What Works in Effective Public Reporting.
    Sandmeyer B; Fraser I
    Health Serv Res; 2016 Jun; 51 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1159-66. PubMed ID: 27120996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Secondary data analysis: techniques for comparing interventions and their limitations.
    Cole AP; Trinh QD
    Curr Opin Urol; 2017 Jul; 27(4):354-359. PubMed ID: 28570290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Registered Reports in the
    Abt G; Boreham C; Davison G; Jackson R; Wallace E; Williams AM
    J Sports Sci; 2021 Aug; 39(16):1789-1790. PubMed ID: 34379576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The end of scientific articles as we know them?
    West R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():276. PubMed ID: 26163126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Considerations on the use of patient-reported outcomes in comparative effectiveness research.
    Alemayehu D; Sanchez RJ; Cappelleri JC
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S27-33. PubMed ID: 22074672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gathering data from older adults via proxy respondents: research challenges.
    Wolinsky FD; Jones MP; Wehby GL
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Nov; 1(6):467-70. PubMed ID: 24236462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.