These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26883609)

  • 1. Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine During Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions in Children.
    Mittal M; Sharma S; Kumar A; Chopra R; Srivastava D
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 26883609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth.
    Rathi NV; Khatri AA; Agrawal AG; M SB; Thosar NR; Deolia SG
    Anesth Prog; 2019; 66(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 30883236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Articaine use does not routinely eliminate the need for palatal injections for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized cross-over clinical trial.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Maghsoudi N
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):603-611. PubMed ID: 34853915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Majid OW; Ahmed AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction.
    Bataineh AB; Nusair YM; Al-Rahahleh RQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3239-3248. PubMed ID: 30417227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Efficacy of 4% Articaine Versus 2% Lidocaine in Inducing Palatal Anesthesia for Tooth Extraction in Different Maxillary Regions.
    Gholami M; Banihashemrad A; Mohammadzadeh A; Ahrari F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug; 79(8):1643-1649. PubMed ID: 33757745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind, randomised, clinical trial.
    Rayati F; Haeri M; Norouziha A; Jabbarian R
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 59(6):695-699. PubMed ID: 34053801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
    Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
    J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia.
    Luqman U; Majeed Janjua OS; Ashfaq M; Irfan H; Mushtaq S; Bilal A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 25772957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine infiltration versus 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of primary mandibular molars: A prospective, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial.
    Jain K; Katge F; Chimata VK; Patil D; Ghadge S; Bhanushali N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2021; 39(4):409-415. PubMed ID: 35102967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulpal anesthesia of maxillary first molars using 4% articaine infiltration in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Afkhami F; Rostami G; Peters OA; Kamalian F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3999-4006. PubMed ID: 37243822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.
    Nydegger B; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Articaine Versus Lidocaine Concentration in the Palatal Tissues After Supraperiosteal Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia.
    Al-Mahalawy H; Abuohashish H; Chathoth S; Al-Masoud N; Al-Jandan B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 76(2):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 29102601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Feasibility of permanent maxillary tooth removal using articaine anesthesia without palatal injection].
    Peng M; Zhu ZM; Yang XM
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 26(4):416-8. PubMed ID: 18780504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
    Srinivasan N; Kavitha M; Loganathan CS; Padmini G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 19101495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the buccal injection versus buccal and palatal injection for extraction of permanent maxillary posterior teeth using 4% articaine: a split mouth study.
    Iyengar AN; Dugal A; Ramanojam S; Patil VS; Limbhore M; Narla B; Mograwala HJ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Apr; 59(3):281-285. PubMed ID: 33581884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of single buccal infiltration anesthesia of 4% articaine with either 1:100,000 or 1:200,000 epinephrine on pulpal blood flow and anesthesia of maxillary first molars and second premolars in humans.
    Kijsamanmith K; Sriworapongpun C; Pawasut N; Huayhongthong N; Sakulyuenyong T; Krongyoungyuen P; Samdrup T
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):343-351. PubMed ID: 34041607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.
    Fan S; Chen WL; Yang ZH; Huang ZQ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 18996033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vivo, randomized, controlled comparative evaluation of efficacy, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications of 4% articaine using buccal infiltration and 2% lidocaine using inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular primary molars of children aged 6 to 8 years.
    Khanna SR; Rao D; Panwar S; Ameen S
    Quintessence Int; 2021 Sep; 52(9):780-786. PubMed ID: 34076382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible?
    Uckan S; Dayangac E; Araz K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):733-5. PubMed ID: 17138173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.