These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26883811)

  • 1. Calibrating the Medical Council of Canada's Qualifying Examination Part I using an integrated item response theory framework: a comparison of models and designs.
    De Champlain AF; Boulais AP; Dallas A
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2016; 13():6. PubMed ID: 26883811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple-choice tests: polytomous IRT models misestimate item information.
    García-Pérez MA
    Span J Psychol; 2014 Dec; 17():E88. PubMed ID: 26054359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of local item dependencies in the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part I.
    Van Barneveld C; Childs RA
    Acad Med; 2003 Oct; 78(10 Suppl):S65-7. PubMed ID: 14557099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weighting checklist items and station components on a large-scale OSCE: is it worth the effort?
    Sandilands DD; Gotzmann A; Roy M; Zumbo BD; De Champlain A
    Med Teach; 2014 Jul; 36(7):585-90. PubMed ID: 24787530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Best-fit model of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the 2010 Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part I clinical decision-making cases.
    Champlain AF
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2015; 12():11. PubMed ID: 25961675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Automated Scoring to Evaluate Written Responses in English and French on a High-Stakes Clinical Competency Examination.
    Latifi S; Gierl MJ; Boulais AP; De Champlain AF
    Eval Health Prof; 2016 Mar; 39(1):100-13. PubMed ID: 26377072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.
    Vispoel WP; Kim HY
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):878-91. PubMed ID: 24708082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Liner programming method to construct equated item sets for implementation of periodical computer-based testing of Korean medical licensing examination.
    Seo DG; Kim MG; Kim NH; Shin HS; Kim HJ
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():26. PubMed ID: 30336541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of adding item-response theory analysis for evaluation of the European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma examination.
    Mathysen DG; Aclimandos W; Roelant E; Wouters K; Creuzot-Garcher C; Ringens PJ; Hawlina M; Tassignon MJ
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 91(7):e573-7. PubMed ID: 23927770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Does Calibration Timing and Seasonality Affect Item Parameter Estimates?
    Wyse AE; Babcock B
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Jun; 76(3):508-527. PubMed ID: 29795876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.
    Hays RD; Liu H; Spritzer K; Cella D
    Med Care; 2007 May; 45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. PubMed ID: 17443117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential weighting of errors on a test of clinical reasoning skills.
    Childs RA; Dunn JL; Van Barneveld C; Jaciw AP; McIlroy JH
    Acad Med; 2003 Oct; 78(10 Suppl):S62-4. PubMed ID: 14557098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applying the item response theory to classroom examinations.
    Lawson DM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Jun; 29(5):393-7. PubMed ID: 16762668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A framework for designing, implementing, and sustaining a national simulation network: building incentive-based network structures and iterative processes for long-term success: the case of the Medical Council of Canada's Qualifying Examination, Part II.
    Dauphinee WD; Reznick R
    Simul Healthc; 2011 Apr; 6(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21487346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The introduction of single best answer questions as a test of knowledge in the final examination for the fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists in Clinical Oncology.
    Tan LT; McAleer JJ;
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2008 Oct; 20(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 18585017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Position statement. Licensure, postgraduate training and the Qualifying Examination. Federation of Medical Licensing Authorities of Canada, Association of Canadian Medical Colleges and Medical Council of Canada.
    CMAJ; 1992 Feb; 146(3):345-6. PubMed ID: 1544044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linking Item Response Model Parameters.
    van der Linden WJ; Barrett MD
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):650-73. PubMed ID: 26155754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Transposition of an American-designed comprehensive medical student examination within the framework of the forthcoming French nationwide comprehensive examination. A preliminary study].
    Fournier JP; De Champlain AF; Benchimol D; Staccini P; Subhiyah R; Braun M; Kohler C; Guidet B; Claudepierre P; Prevel M; Scoles P; Holtzman K; Swanson D; Angelucci K; McGrenra C; Goldberg J; Rampal P; Melnick D
    Ann Med Interne (Paris); 2003 May; 154(3):148-56. PubMed ID: 12910041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing concurrent versus fixed parameter equating with common items: using the dichotomous and partial credit models in a mixed-item format test.
    Taherbhai HM; Seo DY
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 17215567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.