199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26883965)
1. Using social network analysis to inform disease control interventions.
Marquetoux N; Stevenson MA; Wilson P; Ridler A; Heuer C
Prev Vet Med; 2016 Apr; 126():94-104. PubMed ID: 26883965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Social network analysis of Equidae movements and its application to risk-based surveillance and to control of spread of potential Equidae diseases.
Sánchez-Matamoros A; Martínez-López B; Sánchez-Vizcaíno F; Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM
Transbound Emerg Dis; 2013 Oct; 60(5):448-59. PubMed ID: 22830597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Network analysis of cattle movements in Uruguay: Quantifying heterogeneity for risk-based disease surveillance and control.
VanderWaal KL; Picasso C; Enns EA; Craft ME; Alvarez J; Fernandez F; Gil A; Perez A; Wells S
Prev Vet Med; 2016 Jan; 123():12-22. PubMed ID: 26708252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the efficacy of regionalisation in limiting high-risk livestock trade movements.
Hidano A; Carpenter TE; Stevenson MA; Gates MC
Prev Vet Med; 2016 Oct; 133():31-41. PubMed ID: 27720025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolated from sheep, cattle and deer on New Zealand pastoral farms.
Verdugo C; Pleydell E; Price-Carter M; Prattley D; Collins D; de Lisle G; Vogue H; Wilson P; Heuer C
Prev Vet Med; 2014 Dec; 117(3-4):436-46. PubMed ID: 25315761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of Swine Movement in Four Canadian Regions: Network Structure and Implications for Disease Spread.
Thakur KK; Revie CW; Hurnik D; Poljak Z; Sanchez J
Transbound Emerg Dis; 2016 Feb; 63(1):e14-26. PubMed ID: 24739480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structural vulnerability of the French swine industry trade network to the spread of infectious diseases.
Rautureau S; Dufour B; Durand B
Animal; 2012 Jul; 6(7):1152-62. PubMed ID: 23031477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Epidemiological implications of the contact network structure for cattle farms and the 20-80 rule.
Woolhouse ME; Shaw DJ; Matthews L; Liu WC; Mellor DJ; Thomas MR
Biol Lett; 2005 Sep; 1(3):350-2. PubMed ID: 17148204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Animal movement in a pastoralist population in the Maasai Mara Ecosystem in Kenya and implications for pathogen spread and control.
Omondi GP; Obanda V; VanderWaal K; Deen J; Travis DA
Prev Vet Med; 2021 Mar; 188():105259. PubMed ID: 33453561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial and network analysis of U.S. livestock movements based on Interstate Certificates of Veterinary Inspection.
Cabezas AH; Sanderson MW; Lockhart CY; Riley KA; Hanthorn CJ
Prev Vet Med; 2021 Aug; 193():105391. PubMed ID: 34091089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vulnerability of animal trade networks to the spread of infectious diseases: a methodological approach applied to evaluation and emergency control strategies in cattle, France, 2005.
Rautureau S; Dufour B; Durand B
Transbound Emerg Dis; 2011 Apr; 58(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 21159152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Network analysis of cattle and pig movements in Sweden: measures relevant for disease control and risk based surveillance.
Nöremark M; Håkansson N; Lewerin SS; Lindberg A; Jonsson A
Prev Vet Med; 2011 May; 99(2-4):78-90. PubMed ID: 21288583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multilayer network analysis unravels haulage vehicles as a hidden threat to the British swine industry.
Porphyre T; Bronsvoort BMC; Gunn GJ; Correia-Gomes C
Transbound Emerg Dis; 2020 May; 67(3):1231-1246. PubMed ID: 31880086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Network analysis of pig movements in Argentina: Identification of key farms in the spread of infectious diseases and their biosecurity levels.
Alarcón LV; Cipriotti PA; Monterubbianessi M; Perfumo C; Mateu E; Allepuz A
Transbound Emerg Dis; 2020 May; 67(3):1152-1163. PubMed ID: 31785089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Network analysis of swine shipments in Ontario, Canada, to support disease spread modelling and risk-based disease management.
Dorjee S; Revie CW; Poljak Z; McNab WB; Sanchez J
Prev Vet Med; 2013 Oct; 112(1-2):118-27. PubMed ID: 23896577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysing livestock network data for infectious disease control: an argument for routine data collection in emerging economies.
Chaters GL; Johnson PCD; Cleaveland S; Crispell J; de Glanville WA; Doherty T; Matthews L; Mohr S; Nyasebwa OM; Rossi G; Salvador LCM; Swai E; Kao RR
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Jul; 374(1776):20180264. PubMed ID: 31104601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Introduction to network analysis and its implications for animal disease modelling.
Dubé C; Ribble C; Kelton D; McNab B
Rev Sci Tech; 2011 Aug; 30(2):425-36. PubMed ID: 21961215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size considerations for livestock movement network data.
Pfeiffer CN; Firestone SM; Campbell AJ; Larsen JW; Stevenson MA
Prev Vet Med; 2015 Dec; 122(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 26276397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The topology of between-herd cattle contacts in a mixed farming production system in western Kenya.
Ogola J; Fèvre EM; Gitau GK; Christley R; Muchemi G; de Glanville WA
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Oct; 158():43-50. PubMed ID: 30220395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Compatibility between livestock databases used for quantitative biosecurity response in New Zealand.
Jewell CP; van Andel M; Vink WD; McFadden AM
N Z Vet J; 2016 May; 64(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 26556178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
