These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26884360)

  • 1. What can Neighbourhood Density effects tell us about word learning? Insights from a connectionist model of vocabulary development.
    Takac M; Knott A; Stokes S
    J Child Lang; 2017 Mar; 44(2):346-379. PubMed ID: 26884360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of phonotactic probability/neighbourhood density on lexical learning in late talkers.
    MacRoy-Higgins M; Schwartz RG; Shafer VL; Marton K
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 23472958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Triggering word learning in children with Language Impairment: the effect of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density.
    McKean C; Letts C; Howard D
    J Child Lang; 2014 Nov; 41(6):1224-48. PubMed ID: 24191951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finding patterns and learning words: Infant phonotactic knowledge is associated with vocabulary size.
    Graf Estes K; Gluck SC; Grimm KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jun; 146():34-49. PubMed ID: 26905502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining the acquisition of phonological word forms with computational experiments.
    Vitevitch MS; Storkel HL
    Lang Speech; 2013 Dec; 56(Pt 4):493-527. PubMed ID: 24597275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment.
    Gray S; Pittman A; Weinhold J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 57(3):1011-25. PubMed ID: 24686926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical learning in emerging lexicons: the case of Danish.
    Stokes SF; Bleses D; Basbøll H; Lambertsen C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1265-73. PubMed ID: 22337494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding Bilingual Word Learning: The Role of Phonotactic Probability and Phonological Neighborhood Density.
    Nair VK; Biedermann B; Nickels L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3551-3560. PubMed ID: 29114764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Influence of Phonotactic Probability on Nonword Repetition and Fast Mapping in 3-Year-Olds With a History of Expressive Language Delay.
    MacRoy-Higgins M; Dalton KP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1773-9. PubMed ID: 26540310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: a comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays.
    Storkel HL; Maekawa J; Hoover JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):933-49. PubMed ID: 20543024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods?
    Jones SD; Brandt S
    J Child Lang; 2019 Nov; 46(6):1260-1273. PubMed ID: 31500682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 12-month-olds' phonotactic knowledge guides their word-object mappings.
    MacKenzie H; Curtin S; Graham SA
    Child Dev; 2012; 83(4):1129-36. PubMed ID: 22537246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of prior phonotactic knowledge on infant word segmentation: the case of nonadjacent dependencies.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 23275409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in the influence of phonological characteristics on expressive vocabulary development by young children.
    Maekawa J; Storkel HL
    J Child Lang; 2006 Aug; 33(3):439-59. PubMed ID: 17017275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word learning by preschoolers with SLI: effect of phonotactic probability and object familiarity.
    Gray S; Brinkley S; Svetina D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1289-300. PubMed ID: 22411280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Success in learning similar-sounding words predicts vocabulary depth above and beyond vocabulary breadth.
    VAN Goch MM; Verhoeven L; McQueen JM
    J Child Lang; 2019 Jan; 46(1):184-197. PubMed ID: 30236168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning about sounds contributes to learning about words: effects of prosody and phonotactics on infant word learning.
    Graf Estes K; Bowen S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Mar; 114(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 23177349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental change is key to understanding primary language impairment: the case of phonotactic probability and nonword repetition.
    McKean C; Letts C; Howard D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1579-94. PubMed ID: 23926294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The arbitrariness of the sign: learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary.
    Monaghan P; Christiansen MH; Fitneva SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Aug; 140(3):325-47. PubMed ID: 21517205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Word recognition and nonword repetition in children with language disorders: the effects of neighborhood density, lexical frequency, and phonotactic probability.
    Rispens J; Baker A; Duinmeijer I
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 58(1):78-92. PubMed ID: 25421294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.