These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2688532)

  • 1. [Phlebography of the lower limbs: comparative trial of iopromide 370 and ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml].
    Lasjaunias P
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):347-53. PubMed ID: 2688532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Iopromide 370 in coronaroventriculography, versus ioxaglate 320 mg/ml].
    Petitier H
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):333-5. PubMed ID: 2688529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Tolerability of a new non-ionic contrast medium, iopromide in x-ray computed tomography. Comparison with ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml].
    Fredy D; Heitz F; Mathieu D; Vasile N
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):358-60. PubMed ID: 2688533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Value of a new non-ionic contrast medium, iopromide 300 in renal arteriography using an arterial route. Comparative study with ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml].
    Laval-Jeantet M; Martin-Bouyer Y
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):344-6. PubMed ID: 2596812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Pediatric angiocardiography. Randomized, controlled study of 2 iodinated contrast media: iopromide 300 and ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml].
    Amiel M; Revel D
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):336-8. PubMed ID: 2688530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Digital arteriography using an intra-arterial route in vertebrobasilar insufficiency. Comparison of iopromide 300 and ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml].
    Arnaud O; Salamon G
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):339-41. PubMed ID: 2688531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate and delayed tolerance of iohexol and ioxaglate in lower limb phlebography: a double-blind comparative study in humans.
    Bertrand P; Delhommais A; Alison D; Rouleau P
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):683-6. PubMed ID: 9419625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Iopromide 300 and 370. Meta-analysis of a randomized prospective clinical trial conducted in France in 1987. Overall results of tolerability and efficacy].
    Broussel R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):329-32. PubMed ID: 2688528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of sodium-meglumine ioxaglate and iopromide in coronary angiography.
    Neiss AC; Barth P; Chastin I; Erdmann E
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2662884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adverse reactions of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media when used together or separately during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Juergens CP; Khaing AM; McIntyre GJ; Leung DY; Lo ST; Fernandes C; Hopkins AP
    Heart Lung Circ; 2005 Sep; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16352273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iodixanol in leg phlebography: a randomized, double-blind parallel group phase III trial comparing iodixanol to ioxaglate.
    Sapoval MR; Beyssen BM; Girardot C; Musset MA; Legmann P; Brekke O; Gaux JC
    Clin Radiol; 1996 Mar; 51(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 8605753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative trial of the diagnostic quality of and tolerance for two low concentration low osmolality contrast media for phlebography.
    Bowles JN; Thomas ML; Treweeke PS
    Eur J Radiol; 1986 Nov; 6(4):301-2. PubMed ID: 3539601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of monoionic and nonionic radiographic contrast media on cutaneous microcirculation in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Franzeck UK; Schalch I; Seiler Y; Schneider E; Bollinger A
    Microvasc Res; 1995 Jul; 50(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 7476576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
    Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Contrast media in peripheral angiography: does cost reduction mean loss of quality and safety? A reevaluation based on a randomized double-blind comparative study of ioxaglate versus iopromide].
    Lammer J; Winkelbauer F; Thurnher S; Wildling R; Farres MT; Woessmer B
    Rofo; 1996 May; 164(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 8634406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative trial of the tolerance and diagnostic quality of iopromide and iopamidol when used for leg phlebography.
    Thomas ML; Creagh MF; Mahraj RP; Tung KT
    Vasa; 1988; 17(4):273-4. PubMed ID: 3071012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
    Goldberg SN; Abrahams J; Drayer BP; Golding S; Bernardino M; Brunetti J
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S76-83; discussion S93. PubMed ID: 8071050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Haemostatic effects of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media: a double-blind comparative study.
    Hoffmann JJ; Tielbeek AV; Krause W
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Mar; 73(867):248-55. PubMed ID: 10817039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Iohexol vs. ioxaglate in lower extremity angiography: a comparative randomized double-blind study in 80 patients.
    Krouwels MM; Overbosch EH; Guit GL
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 May; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 8793433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Iopromide, a new contrast medium for angiography. Clinical study and comparison with other low-osmolar contrast media].
    Steidle B; Wolf KJ; Banzer D; Seyferath W
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1984 Aug; 109(34):1275-8. PubMed ID: 6381018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.