122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26885525)
1. Biomechanical Comparison of Pedicle Screw Augmented with Different Volumes of Polymethylmethacrylate in Osteoporotic and Severely Osteoporotic Synthetic Bone Blocks in Primary Implantation: An Experimental Study.
Liu D; Zhang XJ; Liao DF; Zhou JJ; Li ZQ; Zhang B; Wang CR; Lei W; Kang X; Zheng W
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():9627504. PubMed ID: 26885525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: an experimental study.
Liu D; Zhang B; Xie QY; Kang X; Zhou JJ; Wang CR; Lei W; Zheng W
Spine J; 2016 Sep; 16(9):1124-32. PubMed ID: 27130374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical study of injectable hollow pedicle screws for PMMA augmentation in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: effect of PMMA distribution and volume on screw stability.
Liu D; Sheng J; Wu HH; Kang X; Xie QY; Luo Y; Zhou JJ; Zheng W
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Dec; 29(6):639-646. PubMed ID: 30192220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparative study of the stability of injectable pedicle screws with different lateral holes augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae.
Liu D; Sheng J; Luo Y; Huang C; Wu HH; Zhou JJ; Zhang XJ; Zheng W
Spine J; 2018 Sep; 18(9):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 29567517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical Comparison of Expansive Pedicle Screw and Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented Pedicle Screw in Osteoporotic Synthetic Bone in Primary Implantation: An Experimental Study.
Liu D; Shi L; Lei W; Wei MQ; Qu B; Deng SL; Pan XM
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):E351-7. PubMed ID: 27137160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PMMA-augmentation of incompletely cannulated pedicle screws: a cadaver study to determine the benefits in the osteoporotic spine.
Goost H; Deborre C; Wirtz DC; Burger C; Prescher A; Fölsch C; Pflugmacher R; Kabir K
Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(4):607-15. PubMed ID: 24837053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.
Zhuang XM; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E925-31. PubMed ID: 20098349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biomechanical cadaveric analysis of polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation.
Frankel BM; D'Agostino S; Wang C
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 17633487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Augmented PMMA distribution: improvement of mechanical property and reduction of leakage rate of a fenestrated pedicle screw with diameter-tapered perforations.
Tan QC; Wu JW; Peng F; Zang Y; Li Y; Zhao X; Lei W; Wu ZX
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):971-7. PubMed ID: 26849712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of expansive pedicle screw and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw in osteoporotic sheep lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical and interfacial evaluations.
Liu D; Zhang Y; Zhang B; Xie QY; Wang CR; Liu JB; Liao DF; Jiang K; Lei W; Pan XM
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74827. PubMed ID: 24086381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of different techniques in primary spinal surgery in osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: expansive pedicle screw versus polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw.
Liu D; Wu ZX; Pan XM; Fu SC; Gao MX; Shi L; Lei W
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Sep; 131(9):1227-32. PubMed ID: 21387138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of cannulated pedicle screws for fixation in osteoporotic spines and comparison of its clinical results and biomechanical characteristics with the needle injection method.
Chang MC; Kao HC; Ying SH; Liu CL
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Aug; 26(6):305-15. PubMed ID: 23887077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision of the failed pedicle screw in osteoporotic lumbar spine: biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate augmentation.
Derinçek A; Türker M; Cinar M; Cetik O; Kalaycioğlu B
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2012; 23(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 22765490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhancing pedicle screw fixation in the aging spine with a novel bioactive bone cement: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Zhu Q; Kingwell S; Li Z; Pan H; Lu WW; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(17):E1030-7. PubMed ID: 22531472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiofrequency-activated PMMA-augmentation through cannulated pedicle screws: A cadaver study to determine the biomechanical benefits in the osteoporotic spine.
Karius T; Deborre C; Wirtz DC; Burger C; Prescher A; Fölsch A; Kabir K; Pflugmacher R; Goost H
Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(2):327-342. PubMed ID: 27886018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 2 kinds of pedicle screws in primary spinal instrumentation: biomechanical and interfacial evaluations in sheep vertebrae in vitro.
Liu D; Zhang Y; Lei W; Wang CR; Xie QY; Liao DF; Jiang K; Zhou JS; Zhang B; Pan XM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Apr; 27(2):E72-80. PubMed ID: 23732180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pedicle screw design and cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebrae: effects of fenestrations and cement viscosity on fixation and extraction.
Choma TJ; Pfeiffer FM; Swope RW; Hirner JP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Dec; 37(26):E1628-32. PubMed ID: 22996264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increased stability due to symmetric cement volume in augmented pedicle screws? A biomechanical study.
Weber M; Lenz M; Egenolf P; Prescher A; Walter S; Heck VJ; Eysel P; Scheyerer MJ
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2024 Jan; 112(1):e35339. PubMed ID: 37955803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical strength comparison of pedicle screw augmentation using poly-dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (P-DCPD) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cements.
Criado A; Yokhana S; Rahman T; McCarty S; Andrecovich C; Ren W; Yassir WK
Spine Deform; 2020 Apr; 8(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 32030639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]