These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26886098)

  • 1. p-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research.
    Bruns SB; Ioannidis JP
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149144. PubMed ID: 26886098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is There Evidence of P-Hacking in Imaging Research?
    Rooprai P; Islam N; Salameh JP; Ebrahimzadeh S; Kazi A; Frank R; Ramsay T; Mathur MB; Absi M; Khalil A; Kazi S; Dawit H; Lam E; Fabiano N; McInnes MDF
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2023 Aug; 74(3):497-507. PubMed ID: 36412994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tempest in a teacup: An analysis of p-Hacking in organizational research.
    Gupta A; Bosco F
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281938. PubMed ID: 36827325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.
    Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):666-81. PubMed ID: 26186117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Problems in using p-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate of p-hacking and evidential value.
    Bishop DV; Thompson PA
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1715. PubMed ID: 26925335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some properties of p-curves, with an application to gradual publication bias.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):546-560. PubMed ID: 28425729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. P-curve: a key to the file-drawer.
    Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):534-47. PubMed ID: 23855496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. P-Curve Analysis of the Köhler Motivation Gain Effect in Exercise Settings: A Demonstration of a Novel Technique to Estimate Evidential Value Across Multiple Studies.
    Hill CR; Samendinger S; Rymal AM
    Ann Behav Med; 2021 Jun; 55(6):543-556. PubMed ID: 33031538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. P-Hacking in Orthopaedic Literature: A Twist to the Tail.
    Bin Abd Razak HR; Ang JE; Attal H; Howe TS; Allen JC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(20):e91. PubMed ID: 27869632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The earth is flat (
    Amrhein V; Korner-Nievergelt F; Roth T
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3544. PubMed ID: 28698825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting?
    Chuard PJC; Vrtílek M; Head ML; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):e3000127. PubMed ID: 30682013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.
    Friese M; Frankenbach J
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):456-471. PubMed ID: 31789538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.
    Head ML; Holman L; Lanfear R; Kahn AT; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2015 Mar; 13(3):e1002106. PubMed ID: 25768323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975-2017).
    Schneck A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292717. PubMed ID: 37847689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size importantly limits the usefulness of instrumental variable methods, depending on instrument strength and level of confounding.
    Boef AG; Dekkers OM; Vandenbroucke JP; le Cessie S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1258-64. PubMed ID: 25124167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Redefining significance and reproducibility for medical research: A plea for higher P-value thresholds for diagnostic and prognostic models.
    Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2020 May; 50(5):e13229. PubMed ID: 32281648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does 'hacking' surface type affect equine forelimb foot placement, movement symmetry or hoof impact deceleration during ridden walk and trot exercise?
    Barstow A; Bailey J; Campbell J; Harris C; Weller R; Pfau T
    Equine Vet J; 2019 Jan; 51(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 29665054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.
    John ER; Abrams KR; Brightling CE; Sheehan NA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):207. PubMed ID: 31726969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpreting observational studies: why empirical calibration is needed to correct p-values.
    Schuemie MJ; Ryan PB; DuMouchel W; Suchard MA; Madigan D
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 23900808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.