These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Processing grammatical gender in Dutch: Evidence from eye movements. Brouwer S; Sprenger S; Unsworth S J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jul; 159():50-65. PubMed ID: 28266334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns: evidence from German and Dutch. Lamers MJ; Jansma BM; Hammer A; Münte TF BMC Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 7():23. PubMed ID: 16526952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Violating stereotypes: eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge. Duffy SA; Keir JA Mem Cognit; 2004 Jun; 32(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 15478749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Processing biological gender and number information during Chinese pronoun resolution: ERP evidence for functional differentiation. Xu X; Jiang X; Zhou X Brain Cogn; 2013 Mar; 81(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 23262177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension. Bartek B; Lewis RL; Vasishth S; Smith MR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1178-98. PubMed ID: 21707210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The processing of the Dutch masculine generic zijn 'his' across stereotype contexts: An eye-tracking study. Redl T; Eerland A; Sanders TJM PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205903. PubMed ID: 30335820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Processing pronouns without antecedents: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Filik R; Sanford AJ; Leuthold H J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18284347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension. Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1859-69. PubMed ID: 21925613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity to Crossover Constraints During Native and Non-native Pronoun Resolution. Felser C; Drummer JD J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Jun; 46(3):771-789. PubMed ID: 27933563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Aging on Interference During Pronoun Resolution. Reifegerste J; Felser C J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3573-3589. PubMed ID: 29222531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An eye-tracking investigation into readers' sensitivity to actual versus expected utility in the comprehension of conditionals. Haigh M; Ferguson HJ; Stewart AJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):166-85. PubMed ID: 23710889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Online processing of novel noun-noun compounds: eye movement evidence. Cohen AL; Staub A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):147-65. PubMed ID: 23697393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ambiguous pronoun resolution: contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts. Järvikivi J; van Gompel RP; Hyönä J; Bertram R Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):260-4. PubMed ID: 15828971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]