These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26886759)
1. Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change. Haigh M; Wood JS; Stewart AJ Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):819-36. PubMed ID: 26886759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Slipping on slippery slope arguments. Fumagalli R Bioethics; 2020 May; 34(4):412-419. PubMed ID: 32115760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A logical analysis of slippery slope arguments. Spielthenner G Health Care Anal; 2010 Jun; 18(2):148-63. PubMed ID: 19507036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human gene therapy and slippery slope arguments. McGleenan T J Med Ethics; 1995 Dec; 21(6):350-5. PubMed ID: 8778459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human gene therapy: down the slippery slope? Holtug N Bioethics; 1993 Oct; 7(5):402-19. PubMed ID: 11656251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value-impregnated factual claims and slippery-slope arguments. Helgesson G; Lynøe N; Juth N Med Health Care Philos; 2017 Mar; 20(1):147-150. PubMed ID: 27581427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The empirical slippery slope from voluntary to non-voluntary euthanasia. Lewis P J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 17341228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans. Walton D Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1507-1528. PubMed ID: 28000092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regulating germ-line gene therapy to avoid sliding down the slippery slope. Pattinson SD Med Law Int; 2000; 4(3-4):213-22. PubMed ID: 15040363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of argument structure on judgements of argument strength, function, and adequacy. Ricco RB Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Apr; 61(4):641-64. PubMed ID: 18938280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rational hypocrisy: a Bayesian analysis based on informal argumentation and slippery slopes. Rai TS; Holyoak KJ Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(7):1456-67. PubMed ID: 24646370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies. Hahn U; Oaksford M Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments. Hayes BK; Wei P; Dunn JC; Stephens RG J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):699-719. PubMed ID: 31343253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New Paradigms in the Psychology of Reasoning. Oaksford M; Chater N Annu Rev Psychol; 2020 Jan; 71():305-330. PubMed ID: 31514580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance. Oaksford M; Hahn U Can J Exp Psychol; 2004 Jun; 58(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 15285597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The characteristics of a valid "empirical" slippery-slope argument. Ozar D J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(4):301-2. PubMed ID: 1463886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. After the slippery slope: Dutch experiences on regulating active euthanasia. Boer TA J Soc Christ Ethics; 2003; 23(2):225-42. PubMed ID: 16175719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments. Lillo-Unglaube M; Canales-Johnson A; Navarrete G; Bravo CF Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1420. PubMed ID: 25566112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The slippery-slope argument. van der Burg W J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(4):256-68. PubMed ID: 1463876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]