BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

658 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26887872)

  • 1. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
    Campos LS; Limberger LF; Stein AT; Kalil AN
    Trials; 2013 Sep; 14():293. PubMed ID: 24028441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extent of disease as an indication for pelvic radiation following radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection in the treatment of stage IB and IIA cervical carcinoma.
    Monk BJ; Cha DS; Walker JL; Burger RA; Ramsinghani NS; Manetta A; DiSaia PJ; Berman ML
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jul; 54(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 8020837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk factors for recurrence in patients with stage IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy and postoperative pelvic irradiation.
    Lin HH; Cheng WF; Chan KW; Chang DY; Chen CK; Huang SC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 88(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 8692515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preoperative prognostic variables and the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy on the outcomes of Stage IB or II cervical carcinoma patients with or without pelvic lymph node metastases: an analysis of 891 cases.
    Lai CH; Hong JH; Hsueh S; Ng KK; Chang TC; Tseng CJ; Chou HH; Huang KG
    Cancer; 1999 Apr; 85(7):1537-46. PubMed ID: 10193944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lack of effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix Stage IB and IIA treated with preoperative irradiation and surgery.
    Grigsby PW; Perez CA; Chao KS; Elbendary A; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Mutch DG
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):645-51. PubMed ID: 10524418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lymph node metastases and prognosis in patients with stage IA2 cervical cancer.
    Buckley SL; Tritz DM; Van Le L; Higgins R; Sevin BU; Ueland FR; DePriest PD; Gallion HH; Bailey CL; Kryscio RJ; Fowler W; Averette H; van Nagell JR
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 8898159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic factors of early stage cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy.
    Sevin BU; Nadji M; Lampe B; Lu Y; Hilsenbeck S; Koechli OR; Averette HE
    Cancer; 1995 Nov; 76(10 Suppl):1978-86. PubMed ID: 8634988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human papillomavirus type 18: association with poor prognosis in early stage cervical cancer.
    Burger RA; Monk BJ; Kurosaki T; Anton-Culver H; Vasilev SA; Berman ML; Wilczynski SP
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 Oct; 88(19):1361-8. PubMed ID: 8827013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of survival outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy and direct surgery in IB2/IIA2 cervical adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study.
    Ouyang P; Cai J; Gui L; Liu S; Wu NY; Wang J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1247-1255. PubMed ID: 32221709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified type IV-V radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of patients with stage III cervical carcinoma. Feasibility, technique, and clinical results.
    Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; Cutillo G; Greggi S; Salerno MG; Amoroso M; Scambia G; Mancuso S
    Cancer; 1996 Dec; 78(11):2359-65. PubMed ID: 8941007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix stage IB and IIA: results of postoperative irradiation in patients with microscopic infiltration in the parametrium and/or lymph node metastasis.
    González González D; Ketting BW; van Bunningen B; van Dijk JD
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1989 Feb; 16(2):389-95. PubMed ID: 2921143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.
    Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT
    Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parametrial involvement, regardless of nodal status: a poor prognostic factor for cervical cancer.
    Zreik TG; Chambers JT; Chambers SK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 87(5 Pt 1):741-6. PubMed ID: 8677078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer.
    Plante M; Kwon JS; Ferguson S; Samouëlian V; Ferron G; Maulard A; de Kroon C; Van Driel W; Tidy J; Williamson K; Mahner S; Kommoss S; Goffin F; Tamussino K; Eyjólfsdóttir B; Kim JW; Gleeson N; Brotto L; Tu D; Shepherd LE; ;
    N Engl J Med; 2024 Feb; 390(9):819-829. PubMed ID: 38416430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with Stages IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Sakuragi N; Satoh C; Takeda N; Hareyama H; Takeda M; Yamamoto R; Fujimoto T; Oikawa M; Fujino T; Fujimoto S
    Cancer; 1999 Apr; 85(7):1547-54. PubMed ID: 10193945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of tumor
    Zhao J; Liu Q; Jiang D; Chen T; Meng S; Shu C
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Nov; 48(11):1686-1695. PubMed ID: 38432859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and oncological efficacy of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph-node dissection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Chao YK; Chiu CH; Liu YH
    Esophagus; 2020 Jan; 17(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 31428901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A retrospective study of the effects of uterine manipulators on prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.
    Guo X; Zhao E; Guan Z; Li W; Zhang J; Tian S; Yao Y
    J Int Med Res; 2024 Mar; 52(3):3000605241233966. PubMed ID: 38553028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Brockbank E; Kokka F; Bryant A; Pomel C; Reynolds K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Apr; (4):CD008217. PubMed ID: 21491407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.